Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement
Status
Not open for further replies.

.22 magnum for deer

1 reading
85K views 103 replies 54 participants last post by  Digital Dan  
#1 ·
If you hunted deer in Maine it is legal to use .22 WMR. One thing is certain, if you could take a head shot FMJ is ideal. What if you had a chance to take a broadside chest shot in the lung area. What would you use ? What distance would you draw your limit and not take a shot ? Any point I have missed please feel free to discuss.
 
#14 ·
Same rules we have in Arizona. But according to Maine's website:

"•Deer may not be hunted with the use of dogs, artificial lights, snares, traps, set guns or any firearm using .22 caliber rimfire cartridges, except that .22 caliber rimfire magnum cartridges are permitted. "

http://www.maine.gov/ifw/laws_rules/hunting_trapping/hunt_traplaws.htm

Surprises me, but there it is. I know one RFC member regularly hunts deer with a .22LR, which is legal in his state. He is a fantastic marksman, mind you, and apparently also a very good hunter as he takes his deer at very close range with shots to the brain cavity. The trick there is understanding the anatomy of the skull.... a head shot isn't enough, eh?

I wouldn't take a heart/lung shot with a rimfire cartridge. I'm sure a good hit would prove fatal, but it would probably involve a lot of tracking to recover the deer.
 
#7 ·
I was discussing this topic with a fellow co worker of mine who happens to be a certified firearm instructor and the owner of 60+ firearms. I take his word on what he says to me as gospel as he has never bs-ed me. With that being said he told me he was walking through the woods him and a buddy and his buddy was loaded with cci stingers in his 22lr. They came upon a deer (I don't remember the size he said) but his buddy fired one shot into the front of it's chest. Dropped it right where it was standing. He stated the bullet exited the deer in it's hind area. I do remember the deer was 100+lbs. Another guy that works here with me takes deer with his .223 Ar 15 all the time. Sometimes he has to track them tho, but he said that's half the fun!
 
#54 · (Edited)
So, this "stand-up" fella is a certified firearm instructor, the owner of 60+ firearms, and is an accomplice to a poacher?

Interesting mix, no doubt.

There's no doubt in my mind thar deer can be effectively killed with a .22 WMR, and even a .22 LR. The margin of error for bullet placement is slight, and the effective distance limited, but no doubt it can be done...and often is by many with little respect for laws (yes, I realize it's legal in at least one state with the .22 mag). Even if I'd done it myself (I haven't), I'd never recommend either cartridge to others for hunting deer. There are just too many better options that will leave less to go wrong.

Daryl
 
#9 ·
The 223 is a VERY effective close range deer caliber, in spite of many think. There is a tremendous amount of shock transferred on impact.

As for the stinger, and the DRT, it may have happened, but in my opinion, it's a one in a million shot.

As for the OP's question, I have to say if it's legal, use it BUT, if these deer are more than yearlings I would most definitely limit it to head shots and close range. The reason for the close range is less chance of a bad shot since a deer turns his head often, much more so than moving his body.

As for bullet, in spite of what many think about the FMJ and penetration, I would use a 40gr HP or similar weight (or heavier) expanding bullet. I'd stay away from any of the varmint type bullets. The 40gr hpis the equivilent to the 165gr in 30 cal. It's about the ideal weight and design for most all you do with the WMR.

If you shoot a deer in the side of the head even as far away as 50yds, you will not recover the bullet. They penetrate far more than most believe.

All that said, a larger caliber is preferred, but as one poster said, if it's all you have AND you are an excellent shot and patient, then do it.

Is there a chance of losing a deer, of course, but name a caliber someone has shot a deer with and there has NEVER been one lost.

I've shot arrows with razor sharp broadheads clear through deer, I have seen others do it, and the deer have been lost (one was tracked after a 3hr wait, and followed for nearly 3 miles). I've seen deer shot with a 30-06, broadside, run for a half mile (one lung hit) before falling, and if it were not for outstanding, and persistent tracking they too would have been lost.

Deer can absorb a lot of trauma and not die. Heck, there have been men that died from being shot in the shoulder, and no major arteries hit. The shock and trauma alone were enough. On the flip side, there have been guys (like Audie Murphy) hit 5 times and still keep going. Look at the lady in AZ that was shot completely through the head with a 9mm at close range and she's making a miraculous recovery (I hope it a full one too). There is no way to guarantee any caliber, short of a 40mm grenade, that will always kill them.

When I say close shots, I'd keep mine under 30yds, and head shots only. Now if it were a yearling, and legal, I'd go for a heart/lung shot. You punch a .3" to .5" hole through both lungs of a deer, and you will eat venison.

I keep my 22WMR mainly for a survival rifle. In the case such was necessary, it will be my main deer, and pig rifle.
 
#10 ·
With a 22WMR? Unless it was a survival sitation, there is no way I would hunt whitetailed deer with a 22WMR. Too much risk of wounding rather than killing.
 
Save
#11 ·
It's not a 22WMR but I got from a old guy in the U.P. of Michigan a Stevens Model 44 32 Rimfire Long. He said that he never went with out meat. He used the gun with iron sights and only head shot them. Never shot buck because the base of the horns got in the way.
 
#12 ·
comment:

That particular law was enacted in the very early 60's ... The hearing drew such a crowd, (in the hundreds), the hearing had to be moved from the hearing room at the state house to the armory ! After several hours of, at times, heated discussion, the bill was reported out of committee, "ought to pass" and was !

To my knowlege, the use of the .22 mag. when deer hunting is almost non-existant amongst hunters of all ages ... Some people (not Maine res.) deemed the .22 mag. as a "poachers favorite" due to the light reoprt ,,, BUT ,,, "everybody in the know" is aware the .22 lr was and remains THE REAL FAVORITE ! ! !
 
Save
#13 ·
"IF"..."IF".. I were ever to use one for deer.I would use the Winchester supreme 34 grn jacketed hp or the standard Winchester 40 grn hp .Both are proven performers, with good expansion and penetration....Just my $.02 .....your milage may varry
 
#15 ·
Know a couple of guys that were teenagers during the latter part of the depression and into WW2 ( which in their area was still a mighty poor time). They used 22 lr for quite a bit of deer hunting because that was all you could get ammo for and only if you were lucky at that. Head shots were used most of the time. A broadside shot thru the spine behind the front shoulders would anchor the deer,but, required a finisher. A lung shot would work,however,it usually involved some tracking. A 22 mag softpoint (not hollowpoint) will generally penatrate more than a lr. I don't think I would use a fmj as penatration should not be an issue. You would have a very small margin of error so shots would have to be fairly short.
 
#16 ·
It is possible & proven to be done by many. The thing to remember is that it is all about proper bullet placement done within a reasonable range. Personally I hate to see these discussions because the majority are not able to make the proper shot.
 
#18 ·
as a police officer Ive had to dispatch alot of different animals from cats to deer along the side of the road. I keep a colt frontier scout chambered in 22lr in the trunk for just such a chore. But im up close, Here in oregon you need a 223 or up to be legal, for hunting deer... But every state is different, call your fish and game, however it turns out be safe and happy hunting.:bthumb:
 
#88 · (Edited)
This is not accurate...



I will weigh in again, because this quote can be misleading although it is not incorrect... If you are attempting a head shot, the posture of the head is critical... you want your bullet to strike the skull as close to perpendicular as possible... If the deers head is down and it is feeding or smelling a scrape, then a shot to the top of the head would be effective as the bullet would enter perpendiculer to the surface of the skull (I am assuming in this scenario that you are at ground level)... but lets say that the deer lifts his head to look at you while you are aiming... now a bullet impacting at exactly the same spot would likely result in a glancing blow with no or poor penetration, resulting in a wounding loss... so I will requote my original position... can it be done... Yes... should it be done... NO! I will choose a caliber (or weapon, as I bowhunt) with sufficient energy to completely penetrate the chest cavity causing as complete a collapse of the lungs as possible and massive tissue trauma resulting in rapid bleed out...

This is what I am comfortable with for my own hunting... the only time I compromised my own standard, I paid for it. I won't do it again. You will have to be the judge for yourself. And just because something is LEGAL does not mean it is ETHICAL... it just means you won't get busted!

So I am in agreement with "AL" above... head shots can be lethal but they are just too risky... work on your hunting skills and choose lethal shots with a larger margin for error... because error can and does happen... but we try to limit it with ethical, experienced choices.
 
#22 · (Edited)
I have posted this question on several boards and have received a lot of private replies from either people who have been there and done that or knew people who had.

The #1 cartridge choice is the Winchester 40 grain HP. Very controlled expansion and great penetration.

As to where to hit them, most were body shots. I asked the people who had done this what the reaction of the deer was. If the deer didn't drop on the spot, which many did, then it reacted just like a arrow shot deer... If the shot was through the heart or lungs the deer ran anywhere from 20-100 yards. Since I have seen a lot of deer hit with 30-30s and 06s run great distances so hit there doesn't seem to be a lot of difference...

As to the .223...just pick the right bullet and it works fine. A friend has a Winchester Ranger .223 that he bought at WalMart...it is now pushing 35 one shot kills. All but one so far has been dropped in place....the one small doe that ran made it 30 yards. All shots were pass throughs except one 8 point 150 pound buck that was hit in the shoulder. The bullet came to rest under the skin of the opposite side. All but a few of the deer were hit with the Winchester 64 grain SP. The others were the 55 grain Trophy Bonded Bearclaw or the 60 grain Nosler Petition.

The .22 Magnum is my "survival" cartridge pick....it works on most anything in a pinch....of course CB will work in a pinch....

http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/3795408/1

Bob
 
#25 · (Edited)
The .22 Magnum is my "survival" cartridge pick....it works on most anything in a pinch....of course CB will work in a pinch....

http://www.24hourcampfire.com/ubbthreads/ubbthreads.php/topics/3795408/1

Bob
The .22 Mag would be my choice for a survival type of situation too. That was one of the reasons I wanted this topic discussed in addition to its legal use in Maine.
In a normal life situation I would never use a .22 Mag on deer. But in a survival situation it helps to know the capabilities and limitations of your tools on one of the most readily available sources of food.
 
#23 ·
22 mag for deer

I have read on this from time to time. A friend of mine who used to be a rural town cop, used to tell me most of the "poachers" at nite favor the 22 mag. I have one, and just looking at the rounds could never bring myself to try for a deer with one. I prefer a quick kill with minimum suffering.
 
#24 ·
honestly?

It'll never happen legally here in Michigan, but...any WELL PLACED shot would kill the deer. Rip me if you want, but a 22mag directly through the heart on a quartering-away deer inside 100 yards will kill deer regularly. What is the deer going to do, repel the bullet? No. Subsistence hunters have done it for a century or more. How many people have chased deer for miles POORLY shot with much bigger calibers? I've seen that stupidity, so, do I recommend it? Oh, NO! Would it be effective? Of course, PROPERLY DONE.:snipersmi
 
#26 ·
Just to stir the pot a little, which would be more humane, a single well placed 22 Mag or a load of buckshot? Buckshot is legal in several states and untold thousands of deer have been taken using buckshot.
I am not encouraging the use of either, just a thought.
 
#27 ·
a 40gr 22LR has the abilty just as well as a 22 mag, just gotta hit the right spot,,hence my user name.:bthumb: A top dollar Gamo rifle would be more than adequate as well.

Never taken a deer with a 22LR as it is illegal in WA state,,but I know of some outlaws who have.
 
Save
#28 ·
Really good stuff above; Can't add much really, except to say...

Despite the anecdotes you hear about miraculous shots, we hear far less about the losses. I too witnessed a doe killed with a 22: A kid poached one right in front of me with a 22LR HV HP. The doe ran off but was found dead (by the local CO I had called) the following day, about 50yrds from the hit.

A 22cal for deer is just TOO limiting. I've seen deer get up and go, and some lost, with larger calibers. You are MUCH more likely to be asking for problems if you go with a WMR for deer. Since it's legal, IF you try it out; you'll need keen judment and need to be VERY conservative with your shots. You will likely find it just too limiting.

BTW: I don't believe a Stinger passed a deer stem to stern, unless it was just a lucky fragment. Not crying foul, just some details likely lost, or missed, there.
 
#29 ·
.22wrf

Many years ago I had to hunt with an 1890 Winchester in .22WRF. WE called it .22 "Special". This was all we had for a short while. I learned to hate that old pump. However the 45gr. bullets had more velocity than the stuff loaded by CCI now.
I killed a good number of deer, with that old gun. We ate them. I killed deer with buckshot, only used buckshot at night. Killed a few with .22 L.R. later.
I still carry a Bearcat with .22 Mag. cylinder loaded with .22 WRF, for my berry picking, hiking, 4 wheeler gun.
Probably killed more deer by the time I was 20 than most hunters kill in a lifetime.
Have lost 2 deer in all , 1 shot with .243 Nosler partitions, still don't believe it. 1 shot with .25 WSSM. Both deer shot 2-3 times . 1st shots good hits. Tracked forever, and I looked for days. Both deer found dead by others after season. I hate to lose game and have hunted Sitka deer to Grizz.
My favorite deer rifle Win, Mod 71 .348, open sights.
Still may knock down 1 of those 4 legged appetites with ..22 mag. some new heavier loads I see.

Chuck
 
#33 ·
Well now on the ethics part, I would say the same thing about anyone who has to take 300yd shot, but I don't because it's their choice. I stalk with a pistol and most shots are less than 50yds. Now if a person can cleanly harvest a deer with a .22 mag and it's legal where they hunt, I say go for it!
 
#32 ·
poacher's use .22 Long Rifle a lot...

McBendy_Elbow is correct. The .22 Long Rifle cartridge is used a lot by poachers. If you can't get a head shot, put the bullet through both lungs and you will collect your deer. Most deer in Maine are probably taken inside of 50 yards. So, will a .22 mag work, yes it will. As to distances, your accuracy is one limit. The second is the remaining velocity. Given the higher speed of the .22 mag, and having read some impressive results shooting long distances at turkeys wrapped in blankets to simulate clothing, I would think you could take deer out to 100 yards, again assuming you can place your shots at that distance. Sniping at a standing deer should be ok. Running deer, probably best to not shoot.
 
#34 ·
Well, to me ethics is a personal perception of what is right or what is wrong. It is my personal perception that "sport" hunting a deer with a .22rf is wrong. We can take any ethical argument to absurd limits if you want but we won't achieve much in the process.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.