I had my Quad Range out for a shooting session a couple days ago. I had the 17 HMR barrel mounted and wanted to sight in the scope and check a few different weight and bullet combinations. I will cover that effort in another thread, but can certainly add its a Minute of Gopher shooter for sure. This one has the set trigger which I really ❤.
The magazines gets hidden away in the “Range” stock and a bit challenging to insert and release, but workable after a little use. If target shooting off the bench, manually loading each round works well for me. I have both 5 & 10 round mags for both the 22LR & 17 HMR calibers.
Barrel changes are simple by design, but you need adequate clearance between the scope and barrel as the barrel tips up to remove and or insert. I prefer to mount my scopes close as possible to the barrel thus I need to remove the scope to change barrels.
Both of my barrels shoot well - the 17 HMR more than adequate for small critters ( target or live ) and the 22LR does well off the bench with good quality match ammo. I have extraction issues with the 22 LR barrel so will probably leave the 17 HMR barrel on and just be content to shoot critter targets at various ranges off the bench.
At the time - it was the most expensive rimfire I’d ever purchased... But a pre-owned Anschutz 54.18 and falling into the CZ 🐇🕳 have the 22 bench work covered. Overall I like the Sako Quad Range, its a quality product, service is at the low end in the US based on my experience. Some parts are carried by US based firms but expensive ( a new extractor and mags in my case ).
I like the laminated stock - it's solid and adjustable. Name on the side doesn't bother me - I can't even see it when shooting.

. Others can see what your shooting - no interruption to ask what your shooting.
Enjoy the process of research and decision.
.