Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement

?s about "older" TASCO scope.

16K views 26 replies 15 participants last post by  buckweet  
#1 ·
For the past week or so, I've been looking for an inexpensive (read cheap) used scope to mount on my "new to me" 1978 Glenfield "Squirrel stocked" Mod 60. I know that there are some pretty inexpensive new scopes available on-line and at WalMart (as well as other sporting goods outlets). Since the rifle is over 30 years old, I thought I'd look for something used that was of a similar vintage. Yesterday, while checking out the used scope case at my LGS/ pawn shop, I spotted something that I thought might fit the bill. It was a TASCO (yeah, I know, the cheap of the cheap) but it looked to be in pretty good condition. A few minor nicks and no major deformation by the scope rings of it's former mount. The faint remains of the TASCO logo were there but the rest of the nomenclature was dificult to read (especially since I didn't know what I was looking for). I was a multi-focal length, 3-9x and the objective lens aperature was 32mm. Additional markings on the eyepiece specified "Waterproof #624V" there was also a reference that I think means that the optics are Japanese. I tried to do a little info gathering with my "SmartPhone" but the 3G seemed to be running at .5G:(. Since the glass was clear, the reticle was intact and the zoom was smooth, I decided to get it. The sticker price was just under $20 so I figured I had very little to lose. Later, I hit the internet to see just what I had. I didn't find too much that was helpful to me. (Perhaps I need to refine my parameters). I believe that this model is refered to as the Tasco 3-9x32 Supercon Coated Omni-view Opticenterd Riflescope. There were a couple of similar models on Ebay, as well as some original packaging and print ads for the product. There was one reference to the fact that they were available during the mid-70s. Someone on one of the forums mentioned that the TASCOs with the Japanese optics were better than the current models.
I mounted it up on my Mod 60 today using some Weaver rimfire scope mounts and I have to say, "I'm likin' it! and it looks pretty good too.
Image

Image

I do like the fact that it is of a similar vintage RE: the rifle.
All this has lead up to my ?s. I'm not sure but I suspect that this is NOT a rimfire scope. Is it reasonable to mount it up and use it on my Glenfield 60? Are the older Japanese optics superior to those on the current models? Was $20 a reasonable price to pay for a 30+ yr old "cheapo" scope? And finally, are there any tips, hints and/or suggestions that any of you folks out there may have RE: my Glenfield/TASCO plinker? Thanks. Spavac
 
#3 ·
I'm a bit suprized

Since the TASCO brand tends to gravitate to the "low end" of the range of riflescopes that are available and that the Marlin, Ruger, Remington and other 22 cal rifles are generally pretty inexpensive, I thought that my querry would have generated more than one reply. (thanx usmc69) I wasn't expecting rave reviews and actually was anticipating more negative replies than positive ones. Truth be told, it didn't really make any difference since it was not returnable. Sometimes (actually most times), it's nice to get feed back from the wide range of knowledge and experience that exists here on the WWW.
Anyway, in spite of the lack of opinion (either positive or negative), my vintage TASCO seems to perform just fine. I've used it just once at the range so far and that was at 25 yds ( the 50 yd range was occupied and it was too hot to wait until there was an opening). It didn't take much adjusting to zero at 25 but I think that I will zero at 50 yds the next time I hit the range. It just seems more practical to zero at that range instead of 25 or 100 yds. I think that this scope will be just fine for my Glenfield Mod 60. Spavac
 
#4 ·
Since the TASCO brand tends to gravitate to the "low end" of the range of riflescopes that are available and that the Marlin, Ruger, Remington and other 22 cal rifles are generally pretty inexpensive, I thought that my querry would have generated more than one reply. (thanx usmc69) I wasn't expecting rave reviews and actually was anticipating more negative replies than positive ones. Truth be told, it didn't really make any difference since it was not returnable. Sometimes (actually most times), it's nice to get feed back from the wide range of knowledge and experience that exists here on the WWW.
Anyway, in spite of the lack of opinion (either positive or negative), my vintage TASCO seems to perform just fine. I've used it just once at the range so far and that was at 25 yds ( the 50 yd range was occupied and it was too hot to wait until there was an opening). It didn't take much adjusting to zero at 25 but I think that I will zero at 50 yds the next time I hit the range. It just seems more practical to zero at that range instead of 25 or 100 yds. I think that this scope will be just fine for my Glenfield Mod 60. Spavac
You are welcome. Keep the scope and use it. Price was right and it was money well spent. I also use even older Unertl's and Lyman's.

AJ
 
#5 ·
I am being sarcastic right now. Why do we get all these posts from people asking if they did the right thing? Why don't we get a question about what to do or what is correct before the deed is done? The money has already been spent so there is not really a good reason to reply to comfort the poster. Who wants to hear that they messed-up? Just my 2c as a reply to your below statement.

Anyway, in spite of the lack of opinion (either positive or negative), my vintage TASCO seems to perform just fine.
 
#9 ·
In the early 80s I bought a Winchester 30-30 with the same Tasco mounted on it. My dad rassed me about the" Jap Junk" till I took it off. But not being willing to throw it away, I put it on a Marlin 60! I still have the scope its now on a Marlin 25. Its still clear, its still holding zero, what more can I ask of a scope. At the lower Xs you wont even notice the paralax error. DR
 
#11 · (Edited)
Yeah, I know it is a Zombie Thread.....
But I recently bought a late ‘90s 22 with one of these Tasco #624V scopes and know nothing about them. Query up and find this thread. Now I ‘know’ a little more about it; ie, how we gonna know if the questions arent asked?’.
So, for the collective knowledge base here is what I have going on.
It is pretty clear and solid, I was glad to see the 'Made in Japan', but it is ‘fuzzy’ at 50yds. and closer, and clear out at 75ish and on. There seems no provision for ocular focus yet the 'hairs are crisp, and it does not matter to my eye if the power is turned up or down, it is still fuzzy optically out at 50. I do have astigmatism and glaucoma, this may be part of it.
I believe this was not intended to be a '22’ scope so the parallax is at 75ish yds. Not a good choice for me for a 22lr but maybe part of why I got a good deal on the package? Maybe if someone has decent eyesight this is not as noticeable?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1976CB750F
#14 ·
There is no provision for lens focus and it does not matter to my eye if the power is turned down, it is still fuzzy out at 50. I do have astigmatism and glaucoma, this may be part of it, and on my old scopes with an adjustable ocular lens I can dial to clear.
To adjust focus, loosen the ocular from the lock ring - the 3-9 ring - and once focused thighten it back solid.
 
#12 ·
I have an old Tasco 3-9 in my junk box. I don't know it's age or what mod it is. All I know is that I have had it for years, possible 30 or more. When I have a problem and I need to check to see if it is a scope prob I get the old Tasco out and mount it up because I know that it is good. I wish they were like that now.
 
#15 · (Edited)
There is no ‘lock ring’, only a screw. I actually tried that today. It took 3 full turns ‘to the back’ to get focus but the relief inside the scope parts the tip of that screw fits into were far from allowing the screw. I didnt try probing down in there to see if those innards would slide....wonder now that you mention this. Whatdayathink?
 
#18 · (Edited)
Wish that there was a knurled lock ring (like my older scopes have), that was my first inclination to tune it.
There is the ocular bell, a ‘collar’ and the power adj. sleeve, all well together. Try as I might thus far I can get no movement between the ocular and the ‘collar’ and I wont put a wrench on it. It really does seen to not be adjustable, at least not easily.
I suspect it more an issue of my eyes as I can get better focus on the target with my left eye than right and I changed up between my glasses too and see a diff.
Im thinking this is one of those 'perma/auto focus' kind of optic.
This one probably should go on a gun show table, good for somebody, just not me.
 
#21 ·