Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement

Is CZ USA in trouble?

26K views 125 replies 49 participants last post by  steverl  
#1 ·
Start at 14:30min to skip 600 Trail rifle discussion

 
#2 ·

A Czech firearms company's acquisition of American gun manufacturer Colt will delay construction of its proposed North American headquarters and factory at the Port of Little Rock by an additional three to five years, a company spokesman said Monday.
 
#3 ·
Interesting comments:

I started loosing interest in CZ centerfire offerings when the 550 models were discontinued and that took another step downward when the 527 models were withdrawn. I am pleased with the 527 & 550 models I currently have in my possession and have all the calibers covered that I need for any hunting and target shooting. But if something was required, I would look at Bergara, Tikka, one of several others available today, and there is always the previously owned market. So no interest in the 600 line.

I didn’t see any announcements about CZ closing or backing out of the Arkansas deal or moving that function to Hartford, Connecticut ( Colts Facility ) which might have some short term financial benefit, but east coast firearms culture seems to be driving that in the opposite direction.

We will see how this all works out.
 
#8 ·
The last thing the market needed was another IKEA rifle. CZ was pretty much all I have been interested in purchasing new in the last fifteen years. I did buy a Howa mini though, and it’s straight push feed so will never handle rimmed cases. I rebarreled it to 20P and put it in an AT-One and may do more in the future. I really like it now.
 
#22 ·
My interest in CZ bolt-action rimfire rifles died when they discontinued the 452 series. Then my interest in CZ bolt-action centerfire rifles died when they discontinued the 527 series. The last CZ rifle I purchased was a CZ 512 in .22LR and I believe that rifle is now discontinued.

Like others have stated above, I have no interest in the 600 series. I believe (but have no proof whatsoever) that the traditional firearms were discontinued to reduce manufacturing costs, not to introduce firearms superior to those discontinued.

Maybe being an old geezer makes me resistant to plastic and matte finish rifles as opposed to walnut and blued steel rifles. I doubt that one old geezer's opinion in rural South Carolina will influence any decisions made in the Czech Republic but, if CZ were to reintroduce traditional 452 rifles and 527 rifles as "Classics" (think Classic Coke), it would be a joyous occasion.
A young guy at the range remarked to me that he could not understand why old guys are so wrapped up in having an “heirloom rifle.” He would rather just have a gun that shoots well and if it stops shooting well by that time something better will come along.

The funny thing is he will pay some charlatan big money to put together an AR15 for him, when all the guy is doing is assembling off the shelf parts. There is little, if any gun smithing involved on 95% of what I have seen them with and anyone who has enough on the ball to read a recipe book and bake a cake from scratch can, with a few specialized tools and gauges, do the same thing. Same with these modular bolt actions.

The CZ 600 is another disposable rifle and just another ho hum entry into what is becoming a crowded market segment.
 
#18 ·
That is a fabulous looking 550 FS. I'm sure the person that ended up with it is very happy. ;) Just this week I came across a previously owned 550 FS in 308 which I picked it up and looked at it three different times but left it in the rack as I have a pair of older Remingtons - one a target rifle in a Bell & Carlson Medalist stock and the other is a 673 Guide Rifle that shoots sub-MOA as well. Trust me if it would have had a stock like the one pictured . . . I would have taken it home with me just for grins. It obviously falls into that "previously owned market" I mentioned in my previous response and even in its current state is far better than anything the 600 has to offer. (y)
 
#12 · (Edited)
While I'd like to see how it shoots without a can on it, the 600 isn't anything I'd be remotely interested in purchasing. If I'm ever in the market for a fugly, plastic, marginally performing bolt action rifle in .223, though, I'll keep it in mind. Otherwise, that thing is a rip-off at $1100+ MSRP.

The thing to remember about CZ is that it's two completely separate entities. CZ-UB (Uhersky Brod) is the mothership in the Czech Republic and if past history is any indication, they couldn't care less about the North American market. Their priority has been and always will be their (mostly) European military and law enforcement customers. The civilian market remains a distant second on their list of priorities and their North American market has never been much more than a glorified after-thought. That may partially explain why CZ-UB handed over operation of CZ-USA to Colt.
 
#13 ·
My interest in CZ bolt-action rimfire rifles died when they discontinued the 452 series. Then my interest in CZ bolt-action centerfire rifles died when they discontinued the 527 series. The last CZ rifle I purchased was a CZ 512 in .22LR and I believe that rifle is now discontinued.

Like others have stated above, I have no interest in the 600 series. I believe (but have no proof whatsoever) that the traditional firearms were discontinued to reduce manufacturing costs, not to introduce firearms superior to those discontinued.

Maybe being an old geezer makes me resistant to plastic and matte finish rifles as opposed to walnut and blued steel rifles. I doubt that one old geezer's opinion in rural South Carolina will influence any decisions made in the Czech Republic but, if CZ were to reintroduce traditional 452 rifles and 527 rifles as "Classics" (think Classic Coke), it would be a joyous occasion.
 
#14 ·
The problem is a lot of American consumers like plastic and like matt. Or search for the word 'chassis' or 'swapping' on this website.. There are guys here collecting Ruger Wranglers one in each COLOR !!

Who do you think is sending email to the CEO via a company website? Old coots like us? No way. The black chassis, barrel swaping, muzzle device, tacky cool, baggie pants crowd all asking for the latest tasteless gimmick dejour.
 
#15 ·
fourbore -

I have a few (very few) plastic stocked/matte finished rifles (a couple of Ruger American Ranch carbines) but they were bought for rough conditions so that I won't beat a CZ527 carbine to death looking for a feral hog in the woods. They were bought for a specific purpose, not because I prefer them over blue steel/walnut stocks.

That said, I doubt I will ever have need to buy another plastic gun. Certainly not a CZ600 rifle.
 
#19 ·
I too have two Ruger Americans, a rimfire and a 450 Bushmaster. The later complete with a big tank brake whcih I remove when shooting (or hunting). Low cost practical stuff I would not shed a tear if I run over or if Ruger drops the whole product line. The term is truck gun comes to mind, even if they have nothing to do with my truck. Beater is another term. I dont shop a CZ when looking for a beater.
 
#16 ·
CZ is floundering. It has abandoned sporting rifles; focus is on pistols and military stuff. should a military gun be refocused to a semi-sporting market they might offer it.

I'm the same as most of the others in this post. I only look to buy used CZs that were made with quality.

Re Colt purchase. remember these dudes also bought Dan Wesson company.
 
#29 ·
Re Colt purchase. remember these dudes also bought Dan Wesson company.
Yes, CZ-USA bought Dan Wesson and continued making a fantastic 1911. I own a DW Specialist Commander in 9mm (sacrilege, I know) that I'm able to hit a 13"x10" steel target at a confirmed 98 yards about 50% of the time. I couldn't duplicate that with my STI Marauder.

Was it bad, or negative that CZ bought Dan Wesson in your opinion?
 
#33 · (Edited)
That pretty much describes TC, CZ is going that way in the sporting rifle market. Harrington & Richardson at one time made rifles that cost more than a Model 70 and when I was a kid Husqvarna and Weirauch rifles were imported by a cat down on Tacoma Ave. Eddie Bauer‘s gun shop occupied almost half of the first floor, I was interested in at least 80% of the guns at Warshalls or Kesselring Gun Shop. Herters in Lacey had a great shop, Chet Paulson and Parkland Sports in Tacoma were chock a block full of really nice rifles as was Duffle Bag, Washington Hardware and Gun & Bow. Most are gone now, the ones that remain are a shell of their former selves.

I can walk into practically any gun shop in the State today and might, on a good day, see a few new guns that I would have any interest whatsoever in owning, if I’m lucky. Most of it, just has no allure whatsoever to me.

CZ sporting rifles have been the primary exception. When the 457 is replaced by another disposable piece of junk (to me), the Howa mini might still interest me, if they are ever again available over the counter.

These days I rarely even look at the new inventory. I go straight to the used rifles and that’s about it.
 
#35 ·
I seriously doubt CZ is in any real trouble--all you have to do is go to their main site and you can see they remain a major player in the world-wide arms industry. CZ-USA is a different story, go to their website(s) and it's a mixed bag of kludgey interfaces none of which seem to work reliably. I've seen this before with other importers--who may be nothing more than a couple of guys in a small office who really do nothing more than seal up import rights and take a slice of the pie. A sure sign is little if anything in stock.
 
#36 ·
I would imagine the market for CZ bolt action rimfire and center fire rifles is much larger outside of Europe than inside Europe. Yes, many European hunters desire change barrel and straight pull action rifles, but many still prefer traditional bolt guns, with wood and blued steel. As a long term admirer of BRNO and CZ firearms, I think CZ is abandoning much of their customer base by racing towards the the latest feature fad, and latest cost cutting fad. The market is already awash with low end, plastic utilitarian rifles. Granted, many of these perform very well. When I started out years ago I just wanted something that worked. Now I’m only interested in something I find pleasure in owning, even if I don’t use it a lot. I was looking for a 527 when they discontinued the line. Glad I don’t “need” it. Like others, I’m not interested in the 600 series at all. I wrote to CZ USA when I heard about the change over, and expressed my concerns. I was told, don’t worry the new CZs will be better….. I’m more than disappointed.
 
#37 ·
I think we gave CZ more credit than they deserved. In the early years is seems to me the Check Republick and CZ was cash strapped. Former communist basket case. CZ exported these 50 year old designs, with a good old school finish and quality for peanuts! We though they were some mix of marketing genius and gods of manufacturing. No, they were desperate and lucky to have a good product and some old workers. More dumb luck than anything else.

Fast forward, given the oportunity to design new products and export them from a prosperous home economy, they flounder. Someone said the importer was 3 guys in a room. I wonder what they have for engineering staff, two guys in a room. Does the CEO shoot? it is sure no Bill Ruger running that place.
 
#45 ·
OK, if a long list of discontinued models was evidence of insolvency Browning and Ruger would be history.

If something bad is going on with CZ-USA that would indeed be of interest. Please feel free to post that in the form of verifiable public information.

Otherwise this thread is verging on vendor bashing which as a reminder to all is against our rules.

"3. Disagreements with a vendor/manufacturer/seller. We do not allow any public airing of disputes with a vendor or a manufacturer. If you have an issue with someone, take it up directly with them. Do not bash anyone here."

Frank
 
#46 ·
OK, if a long list of discontinued models was evidence of insolvency Browning and Ruger would be history.

If something bad is going on with CZ-USA that would indeed be of interest. Please feel free to post that in the form of verifiable public information.

Otherwise this thread is verging on vendor bashing which as a reminder to all is against our rules.

"3. Disagreements with a vendor/manufacturer/seller. We do not allow any public airing of disputes with a vendor or a manufacturer. If you have an issue with someone, take it up directly with them. Do not bash anyone here."

Frank
See the link I posted above to the Colt/CZ site and read all the tabs to get the story.
 
#48 ·
Frank -

My posts did not concern the financial solvency of either CZ-UB or CZ-USA, rather, I was lamenting the discontinuance of CZ firearms which I valued and were apparently valued by some others as well. I don't have a clue if CZ's ledger books show black or red ink, I simply miss the old blue steel/walnut firearms. I think that many of the comments in this thread echo that sentiment.

Not trying to be disruptive here, Sir. Maybe I missed the sentiment of the thread.

Respectfully - James
 
#50 ·
You're fine James, I like walnut and steel too!

The primary thrust among many of the posters on this thread is that something untoward is happening to CZ and they're in trouble.

Frankly while I lament with you and others the discontinued models that we love I see absolutely zero credibility to the posts proclaiming and agreeing that "CZ is in trouble."

But hey, I'm wrong many times a day and if I am in this case it should be easy to present a factual argument with documentation proving my error.

Show me.

Frank