Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement

Finish on CZ452 Americans

1.1K views 23 replies 10 participants last post by  Toomany22s  
#1 ·
Some are gloss and some are matt finish. Does it have to do with the year of manufacture?
 
#2 · (Edited)
It's more about the receiver..in general, the 'American' marked receivers were gloss blued, the others were matte blued. It's been a while, but I think I remember seeing some exceptions to that...like matte 'American' marked receiver on a 452 varmint
...but generally that is, how it is

The barrels on all of them were polish blued.
 
#5 ·
At the time 452 s were being made CZ was a small company emerging from a communist era and so made many variations of all their guns. Perhaps this was due to supplier limitations etc.
Think about all the action screw variations.
I think they made what they could with the parts they had available.
Image
 
#11 · (Edited)
At the time 452 s were being made CZ was a small company emerging from a communist era and so made many variations of all their guns. Perhaps this was due to supplier limitations etc.
Think about all the action screw variations.
I think they made what they could with the parts they had available. View attachment 571808
No offense but they were not a small company. Maybe a smaller presence in the US.. which is debatable...but small company... Nope.
 
#13 ·
The regular length barrel 452's would have had to change at some point during the run and return to a polished finish in order to have different finishes? That would seem to not be likely. I have a 2012, 452 that has the fully polished barrel/receiver. 2012 was the last normal production year. No, it wasn't the last year they were made, from what some were saying extra parts.

I also own a 2012 452 with 16-inch barrel and threaded muzzle. This model has a matte receiver and semi-polish barrel.
 
#17 ·
You're talking about CZ-USA... sure that's fairly new but.... CZ -USA was literally created for importing and marketing and service in the US...they don't make anything, never have.

CZ-UB (the parent company) has been around for a good chunk of time and is anything but small.

.

 
#20 ·
Read your own article. It was a nationalized , ie govt run company, conglomerated from the rubble of ww2 armament plants until 1992, then privatised at the end if communism , they predominantly made military weapons that were sold to 5th. world countries during the cold war. the 452 was just an iteratin of the brno #2 . A-training rifle for Ethiopia.
Ask yourself this. Why would a company that invented the cz 75 then come out later with the cz 82?
Yes they are huge now , but in the 90 s they werent. Only after they cracked the US market, did they generate enough traction to build new state of the art manufacturing lines, and thats wgen everything became standardized. The 455, same action, screws etc for all rimfires .
the P01 the Nato pistol,


And CZ does/ did manufacture guns in the US , the plastic p10s US Made - CZ P-10 Optic Ready Family | CZ-USA LE/MIL
 
#18 ·
I'm old school and was confused as to what you are talking about as "Matte" as I am used to Matte being a metal finish. My old school thinking about wood finish generally meant Gloss, Semi-gloss, or Satin for the dullest look.

My 452'S appear to both be close to a Satin finish. Both of my gun stocks and I believe ALL CZ gun stocks have Stain mixed with the Polyurethane in order to hide lesser wood and make all of their guns appear the same.

Is this possibly what you are seeing? More or less coverup stain in the Polyurethane.
 
#19 ·
With CZ, until recent years (if then), there seemed to be no hard rules on which model had what. At best, it was "generally speaking" rather than a firm rule. Think of it as a sense of adventure when looking for a CZ. I do really like them! And Brnos too, especially the Model 1s.

Doug