Hey, actually I do have something to post.
Most of my shooting is paper punching from a bench but not in competition. My personal goal is 1 MOA at all distances out to 100 yards, the maximum at nearby ranges. I've got distances from 25 yards out to 75 yards covered in .22lr with a Remington 597 semi-auto (16" sporter barrel) and a left-handed Savage Mk II GL (21" sporter barrel in a Boyd's Pro Varmint stock). Both have the normal mods (lightened trigger pulls, etc.) and have been tested with a wide range of ammo.
I shot one 1 MOA group at 100 yards with the 597 about a year ago, and just missed two or three times, over a period of several years. The 597 averages about 1.2-1.3 MOA. The Mk II has never come close with any ammo, even the "match" stuff.
I also have an AR with a 16-inch 1-in-7" free floated barrel that shot another 1 MOA group at 100 yards over something less than a year. That was with .223 55gr FMJBT, and I'm playing around with 69gr OTM but haven't got near 1 MOA yet. Shooting that stuff gets expensive.
I don't want to shoot 1 MOA at 100 yards every group, but once a year or so gets frustrating. However, I don't want to set a lower goal just yet.
So, beside plugging away with the AR, I'm thinking about a new bolt action gun. I'm trying to decide between a heavy barrel .22lr or a heavy barrel .223. The only .22lrs I can find are the Savage BTVLSS and and the Anschutz 1416 L D HB, twice the price of the Savage. The only .223 I found is the Remington 700 SPS Varmint, which has a 1-in-12" twist which will limit ammo choices. The 700 costs more than the Savage but a lot less than the Anschutz. Maybe I don't need a heavy barrel .223? If a new gun works out, I'd sell the AR upper, since I've got more uppers than lowers anyway.
I know that it's my choice, but does anyone have any thoughts? Has anyone faced the same dilemma? If so, what did you do? Thanks.
Most of my shooting is paper punching from a bench but not in competition. My personal goal is 1 MOA at all distances out to 100 yards, the maximum at nearby ranges. I've got distances from 25 yards out to 75 yards covered in .22lr with a Remington 597 semi-auto (16" sporter barrel) and a left-handed Savage Mk II GL (21" sporter barrel in a Boyd's Pro Varmint stock). Both have the normal mods (lightened trigger pulls, etc.) and have been tested with a wide range of ammo.
I shot one 1 MOA group at 100 yards with the 597 about a year ago, and just missed two or three times, over a period of several years. The 597 averages about 1.2-1.3 MOA. The Mk II has never come close with any ammo, even the "match" stuff.
I also have an AR with a 16-inch 1-in-7" free floated barrel that shot another 1 MOA group at 100 yards over something less than a year. That was with .223 55gr FMJBT, and I'm playing around with 69gr OTM but haven't got near 1 MOA yet. Shooting that stuff gets expensive.
I don't want to shoot 1 MOA at 100 yards every group, but once a year or so gets frustrating. However, I don't want to set a lower goal just yet.
So, beside plugging away with the AR, I'm thinking about a new bolt action gun. I'm trying to decide between a heavy barrel .22lr or a heavy barrel .223. The only .22lrs I can find are the Savage BTVLSS and and the Anschutz 1416 L D HB, twice the price of the Savage. The only .223 I found is the Remington 700 SPS Varmint, which has a 1-in-12" twist which will limit ammo choices. The 700 costs more than the Savage but a lot less than the Anschutz. Maybe I don't need a heavy barrel .223? If a new gun works out, I'd sell the AR upper, since I've got more uppers than lowers anyway.
I know that it's my choice, but does anyone have any thoughts? Has anyone faced the same dilemma? If so, what did you do? Thanks.