Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement
Status
Not open for further replies.

August 2013 Ultimate 10/22 of the Month Entry Thread

7.9K views 65 replies 21 participants last post by  DrGunner  
#1 · (Edited)
Well, July's contest was a resounding success.

My sincere CONGRATULATIONS again, to InfamousJ, on deservedly winning the first UotM contest!!!

Sponsors have offered many more prizes, which will make this whole competition more rewarding and interesting, for sure.
The vote regarding acceptance of member submitted rifles resulted in a resounding "YES!!!" by the members, with 77.22% voting in favor and 22.78% voting against.

The prizes for this month will be provided by Kidd Innovative Design, Raven Eye Custom, and Gunsmither Tools.

Kidd Innovative Design is ON BOARD to give a $150 merchandise credit to the winner, and $100 merchandise credit to the second place rifle EVERY MONTH!!!

***Kidd currently has their Trigger Job Kit, Classic Receiver, and ALL barrels on sale, including their newest "Ultra Lightweight", which is a bargain at $150...

What's more, they have made the offer RETROACTIVE to the July Contest, so InfamousJ and jcrowleyiv will get the same prizes!!!

Kidd is THE Ultimate of the Month Title Sponsor.

The August contest sponsors are Raven Eye Custom and Gunsmither Tools.

Raven Eye Custom will donate a Titanium Ruger 10/22 Tuner kit EVERY MONTH!!!

Gunsmither Tools will donate a Gunsmither 10/22 Tool Kit for an unnamed number of months, a few at least!!!

We still have prizes donated by other sponsors/vendors that will be packaged into bundles for each month.


August Prizes will be:

First Place:

A $150 Coupon redeemable for merchandise from Kidd Innovative Design, and a Titanium Ruger 10/22 Tuner Kit from Raven Eye Custom.

Second Place:

A $100 Coupon redeemable for merchandise from Kidd Innovative Design, and a Gunsmither 10/22 Tool Kit


MY SINCERE THANKS TO Kidd Innovative Design, our Ultimate of the Month Sponsor, and to Raven Eye and Gunsmither for their generous sponsorship of the August 2013 contest!!!!

I would again like to personally thank TheGeek, for all his help, work and support in soliciting donations from our sponsors, and to Sophia and the other moderators for all of their support and insightful advice in putting this contest together. I would also like to thank all of you, the members- for your interest and enthusiasm which played a pivotal role in garnering the attention that has allowed this process to grow so quickly.


August 2013 Ultimate 10/22 Contest Rules:

Ultimate Build Characteristics- These are the areas to be considered when judging rifles and casting your votes:

Originality: Is there anything unique/different about the build?

Material Quality: Simple- what components and materials- Fit & Finish.

Execution: How well does it function? Is it thrown together, or did the builder pay attention to detail, such as paint/polish/customization/ergonomic adaptation

Accuracy: we need a standard. I propose MOA to 50 for scoped rigs as a minimum, and either 2 or 3 MOA to 25 or 50 for iron sight rigs as a minimum.

Artistic Impression: that overall X factor that makes a rifle cool-

Personally, I want this contest to be INCLUSIVE, not EXCLUSIVE.

That means builds that are exceptional, for whatever reason, have a shot.

BR, Tactical, Offhand Custom, Superstock, OEM- ANY 10-22 Variant should be considered.

It might be incredibly beautiful, with no submitted targets.

It might be a hand built, full custom, that looks better than it shoots.

It might be comprised of all aftermarket parts, but was assembled, tuned, bedded maybe refinished and has the targets to prove the work behind it.

It might be a Tactical, well thought out with all the right parts and purpose built.

It might be a plain Jane 10-22 that shoots incredible bug holes and is in pristine condition.

It might be one of the early serial numbers- unfired, NIB, representing our origins.

Leave it to the members to vote and decide.

Tell us about our rifle. Everything you can- and post pictures. I cannot stress this enough, good quality pictures will likely make or break some entries in this contest.
You CAN post a link to another thread, if appropriate, or to your own or another members rifle in one of the picture threads.

PLEASE POST A BIO, BUILD SPECS, TARGETS AND PHOTOS IN THE SUBMISSION THREAD! You may also wish to post a link to the original build thread, if applicable.

IF MEMBERS DON'T SEE IT, YOUR RIFLE WILL NOT CAPTURE ATTENTION AND VOTES!

Submissions/nominations will be accepted from 8/1-8/10

There will be a PRELIMINARY VOTE held from 8/10-8/20, to narrow the field to THREE FINALISTS. MEMBERS will be allowed to cast THREE votes in the preliminary poll to vote for the rifles they consider to be the top three.

The final vote will be in blind poll form, held from 8/20-8/30.

RFC MEMBERS who are INTERESTED in having a contest run in another forum, OTHER THAN Ruger 10-22s, please PM or email me and we will look into expanding this into other areas of RFC in the coming months or in 2014.

Respectfully,

DrGunner
 
Save
#2 · (Edited)
My First Nomination

Dr Heckel's Ultimate BR 10/22- McMillan/Kidd Supergrade:

PER Dr Heckel:

Well here she is, my Ultimate of Ultimates. Ive been planning this build for well over a year but one thing after another kept coming up and setting it back. I got it started in early September by ordering the stock which took just over 4 months to finish. After that it spent the next 2 months at KIDD getting the Supergrade action installed. I couldnt be any happier with how it turned out. It feels great and looks dang good too. Im hoping it will be able to average in the .2"s at 50 with good ammo and a bit of luck...we'll see. Ive still got to take it back to McMillan to get the ejection port cut-out on the stock matched up with the receiver but Im hoping that wont take too long, they said it would be no problem...again, we'll see:D

Components-
--KIDD Supergrade w/ rear tang, 10MOA base
--KIDD 20" bead blasted match barrel
--KIDD two stage trigger(3/3oz) with speed release and black straight trigger
--KIDD black scalloped bolt
--McMillan Anschutz BR-50 stock lt grey/med grey/ black flame marble
--Weaver T36 scope, 1/8 dot reticle
--Burris Signature Zee rings, medium

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image
Image


Better pics on page 4...click HERE or SLIDESHOW

http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=495222

Looks like TBR hasn't finished the 10/22 Brass Mannlicher, so my vote goes to the good Dr Heckel, and his Kidd Masterpiece!

Regards,

DrGunner
 
Save
#6 · (Edited)
Barrett M82 10/22 conversion

Bone stock 10/22
Full metal Barrett M82 chassis, bipod, barrel shroud, magazine
Weighs 14-15 lbs
Bushnell Banner 3x9-50

Have about $600 into this build.
M82 chassis was $340 alone

It's just a fun range plinker at the shooting gallery. Never really shot it for groups yet.

Image

Image

Image


 
#22 ·
#34 · (Edited)
I would be remiss if I didn't nominate Dr. Gunner's ELK:
http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=510778
While I VERY MUCH appreciate the sentiment displayed by Nosnil22, I personally am going to try and graciously decline to enter my E-L-K rifle this month.

Let me offer my thoughts in explanation:
This rifle had its chance, and the members have spoken and it placed a distant third. For THAT I am truly humbled and grateful- I never expected the nomination, much less making it past the preliminary vote.

I could see accepting if I had made a major change, like putting it in a custom walnut stock or the like, which I have considered and may well do someday. I don't want this contest to be a rehash of the same rifles over and over until each guy wins- my idea is that a rifle CAN be nominated as often as the members see fit, and the owner of said rifle can opt to enter it again, or not.
As the guy running this show, I would prefer to take a step back and let someone else have a shot. Leaving this rifle in month after month until it wins is not fair to all the others entering the contest- especially since I'm the mod of this forum and the co-originator of this contest. I want all rifles that win to garner their votes on the merits of the build, and for NO OTHER reason. That's not to say I wouldn't accept the nomination again if I make improvements to this particular build.
I have another rifle in he works that I'm reasonably confident will do well here- provided that the performance is there- so I won't even post a build thread until that project has decidedly proven it's mettle on the bench; a process that could take a few weeks or many months.

With regards to any one member having mutliple entries:

More power to him/her and-

So be it.

If there's a collection of Ultimates hiding in a safe somewhere, should we exclude them because someone might see it as unfair that one member has the taste and resources to build or buy what we all consider to be worthy???

That member can choose, at any time, to decline a nomination- which could also work to their advantage since an ultimate held back, not competing with denizens from the same home safe, could well be nominated again and win, thus taking TWO top spots and related prizes.

Those opposed to this idea, please speak your mind- but remember, the minute we start imposing restrictive rules this becomes less about what the general consensus of the voters is and more about trying to "induce" fairness- a process I am decidedly against for myriad reasons.

I say, put them up. Let the owners stay in or pull out. Let the voting members speak though their votes and let the chips fall where they may.

We might all learn a thing or two.

If you think it's unfair that one member owns so many nice rifles-

Build something better and win!

That, to me, is the strongest statement a fan of this forum can make. And don't tell me it's about money. The inaugural winner proved that- he built a winner with less money than I have in some of my barrels.

Respectfully,

DrGunner
 
Save
#48 ·
InfamousJ - Thank you very much for your interest in Black Beauty!! I will post some targets that I have shot just last Friday. i had not been able to get this rifle to shoot better than .800" prior to last week, and the change to a Shilen barrel. No problem now - doesn't shoot with Legacy, but very few of my rifles do.

This one does have a very unique look and outlinkk's polish work on it is impeccable. What a great guy to deal with, too.

Thank you again -

John
 
#25 · (Edited)
John Crowley owns this rifle. He's had some additional trigger work done, as far as I know.

This as an old picture. It's in most of the accuracy clubs. The barrel is a Lothar Walther blued Muzzleweight (17") different from the VQ 16.5. The stock is the original Gatewood Teehole prototype specifically turned for this barrel in Claro Walnut. The wood is prettier than this picture, and the figure is triking on all four sides.



If you guys like it, ask John for current pics and targets.

This is my idea of a class act tacticool.
 
#50 ·
Passinby - Thank you for the mention!! This is the one that is going to get my attention next. I can only imagine the potential that rests inside that gorgeous piece of Claro.

I will post some updated pictures, as I have added a Leupold 36BR scope to it, and have done a little adjusting to the trigger.

I shot it last Friday and was in the .360" at 50 yards area, target to be posted with the pics.

Thank you again,

John
 
#49 ·
Doc - That beauty of yours has my vote in this go around!!!! It has been said by more than one that it is a "dream" rifle - a sentiment with which I agree. Have you ever thought how it would look with a TI25 silver magazine in it????;);)

We have spoken about it before - it is my favorite BR build that I have seen, thus far. I predict you having a Kidd gift certificate in about 3-1/2 weeks!!!!:bthumb::bthumb:

Have you had an opportunity to shoot it at 50 since it got back to you? That 25 yarder was remarkable, and I look to see many more at the top of the 50 yard leaderboard, too.

John
 
#27 ·
Holy bawls that's a beautiful rifle:eek: OK maybe we should not encourage JC to bring out any more of his collection and let other people have a chance in the UoTM constests:eek: Awesome taste and amazing finish:bthumb:
 
Save
#31 ·
Passinby could fill this competition for a long, long while, all by himself.:eek: By far the most comprehensive group of Ultimates of which I have been aware. I am just very thankful that he chose to entrust some of those masterpieces with me.

I can easily think of 20+ of Passinby's builds that deserve a place on these pages and will ultimately be in the Hall of Fame for very good reason - his creativity.:bthumb: I think that ever member on RFC could find one of Passinby's builds that "speaks" to them.

I have barely been here long enough to rattle the anchor chain - members like Chaser, Passinby, Vincent (and so many more) are the captains of this ship!!!!!

John
 
#30 ·
First, let me send out a sincere and heartfelt thank you to all who have thought so highly about any of my guns, so as to even mention them as possible nominations in this Ultimate of the Month contest. I am so humbled just to think that my tastes in something like a rifle, are shared by so many of you out there.

I think this perfectly illustrates the reason that RFC is so successful - a "sharing" of vastly diverse tastes and opinions with a group that is willing to share their own thoughts and opinions in an open forum format.

I am of the opinion that, in the interest of fairness and "inclusion", as DrG likes to call it, we should limit the number of builds that one owner can have in the competition each month.

I think that "stacking the deck" with builds would diminish interest and ultimately do a disservice to the forum.

This is only my opinion, and I am asking for the unabashed opinions of other members.

I truly hope that all out there who have thought of anything of mine, understands how very appreciative and proud I am of that thought.

Humbly,

John
 
#36 · (Edited)
First, let me send out a sincere and heartfelt thank you to all who have thought so highly about any of my guns, so as to even mention them as possible nominations in this Ultimate of the Month contest. I am so humbled just to think that my tastes in something like a rifle, are shared by so many of you out there.

I think this perfectly illustrates the reason that RFC is so successful - a "sharing" of vastly diverse tastes and opinions with a group that is willing to share their own thoughts and opinions in an open forum format.

I am of the opinion that, in the interest of fairness and "inclusion", as DrG likes to call it, we should limit the number of builds that one owner can have in the competition each month.

I think that "stacking the deck" with builds would diminish interest and ultimately do a disservice to the forum.

This is only my opinion, and I am asking for the unabashed opinions of other members.

I truly hope that all out there who have thought of anything of mine, understands how very appreciative and proud I am of that thought.

Humbly,

John
John- please read post 34 above.

It does not surprise me in the least that you feel this way, your character is such that you feel guilty that others may be excluded if your rifles take the top slots again. I know it's not about prizes for you. As has been said- very well, I might add- by InfamousJ and rokehe- it should matter not WHENCE the top tier rifles come, but that they be judged fairly and on the merits outlined in post 1 of this thread.
If you feel at any time that a particular rifle you own should not be entered, you have the right of first refusal, so to speak. I think you should get used to being here for a while- I have an idea of what's in your safe, and you will be called back here again from time to time.

I see it as an affirmation of your impeccable taste.

DrGunner
 
Save
#32 ·
Well, the first thing that comes to my mind is what I learned early in youth athletics. To be the best, you have to beat the best. It's a shallow victory if the competition is under restriction. I understand that some folks have deep and wide gun safes. The bar is extremely high around here. IMHO, if you have thirty rifles nominated, your odds of winning are increased numerically. However, if I post a build, I have a horse in the race and a chance to pull off the upset. If a rifle can only be nominated three times, and never wins, it most likely shouldn't. this might help to keep new blood flowing
 
#35 ·
Well, the first thing that comes to my mind is what I learned early in youth athletics. To be the best, you have to beat the best. It's a shallow victory if the competition is under restriction. I understand that some folks have deep and wide gun safes. The bar is extremely high around here. IMHO, if you have thirty rifles nominated, your odds of winning are increased numerically. However, if I post a build, I have a horse in the race and a chance to pull off the upset. If a rifle can only be nominated three times, and never wins, it most likely shouldn't. this might help to keep new blood flowing
As usual, well said. I also think that multiple nominations will take care of themselves. Try 2-3 times, and if you still lose, it ain't good enuf, sport!!!

Make a change, start over, or decide its just not that important.

Personally, I don't care a rats posterior if I ever win this.

Not why I started it.

DrGunner
 
Save
#33 ·
Well, fellow members make the nominations of a particular rifle, not the owner...If a person wants to nominate a rifle every month because he wants it to win, then so be it; that's why there are two rounds...If a guy has 15 contending rifles and they all get nominated in a month, if the people speak and pick one, then great! I like seeing as many rifles as possible regardless if one guy owns 20 of them...JC if you're talking about one owner in the final round having the 1, 2, and 3 spot, perhaps there could be a 1 or 2 gun max caveat, but let's see someone do it first;) Bring it on!

Instead of someone seeing it as a way to monopolize winning every month, (or what JC is saying as a way to avoid it) I see it more as inspiration to get people "off the bench" (or on it rather?:eek:) and start competing! And if not competing, then at least sharing their work. I'd like to see a "good" rifle go to "great" because he/she sees someone's build and discovers another way to make it better, and continue on the quest of making it the best it can be within one's own vision and abilities...Winning/competing make the contest fun, but I see the end-game of the contest's excitement being a great way to spread the sickness and addiction of rimfire sports to others...The possibility of someone keeping a rifle hidden or on the sidelines because of some contest rules takes away from the spirit of the game, at least as I see it...

For all the Vincents, Chasers, JCs, Dr. Gs, Parshooters, Turmites, AZguys, Passinbys, etc. that have safe upon safe of contenders, I say bring them all on and let the people speak...If anyone has any problems with the way things are done as time goes on, then hopefully they speak up and their ideas can be incorporated to make it even better...
 
Save
#38 ·
For all the Vincents, Chasers, JCs, Dr. Gs, Parshooters, Turmites, AZguys, Passinbys, etc. that have safe upon safe of contenders, I say bring them all on and let the people speak...If anyone has any problems with the way things are done as time goes on, then hopefully they speak up and their ideas can be incorporated to make it even better...
Infamous, I only wish I had a safe full......I never could afford my own work!:D

I do have two in the planning stages, and one is the mother of all ultimates :D
yeah right, I know you have heard that before.:D The first one I will get completed though should at least compete based upon what it is. A very, very light weight 10/22 squirrel rifle that will look like a squirrel rifle, and coming from me, that is hard to do! I will start the build this next week converting a, well, I guess I had better wait and just doc the build and tease you guys as it progresses! That is how it's done, right?:bthumb:

Mike
 
#37 ·
I think I win with every nomination

Dr Gunner,
You do a great service here and I, for one Thank You. The "Ultimate of the Month" is a truly outstanding way to have people share their remarkable builds with others like myself who have the opportunity to see what hundreds & thousands of hours at the range and at the drawing board can accomplish. What a great way to spread this disease, (had to, sorry). My sincere appreciation to all involved.

Regards,
Scott
 
#39 ·
Quote from InfamousJ:
For all the Vincents, Chasers, JCs, Dr. Gs, Parshooters, Turmites, AZguys, Passinbys, etc. that have safe upon safe of contenders, I say bring them all on and let the people speak...If anyone has any problems with the way things are done as time goes on, then hopefully they speak up and their ideas can be incorporated to make it even better...

Thanks guy. You seem to have misplaced me in among a group of awesome rifle owners. To be truthful, I have not built an Ultimate, having sent my creations onward to others, to build their own Ultimates. Should I see one of my stocks in here, I would be unabashedly honored. And maybe I might come up with one of my own. Ya never know! But thanks for the inclusion with that group of gents......though not so sure I belong there, lol. And also my heartiest CONGRATS on a most well deserved recognition for your great build. Your build embodies everything this thread is about. AWESOME job!

And DOC! This thing has really turned into a great forum. You have breathed life back into it and there are more folks in here now then ever before. Super job my friend.:bthumb:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have insufficient privileges to reply here.