Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement

A 1928? M52

2 reading
1.5K views 11 replies 7 participants last post by  doubs43  
#1 ·
Hello Gentlemen ( from down in New Zealand). Follows a couple of photos of a M52 I have been offered by an acquaintance of long standing - we have traded guns for more than 40 years but never shared a coffee, however he is a good man!

Image

Image


Neither of us knows very much about 52s so I would appreciate any thoughts you guys might have on this rifle. I have checked the bore and it is excellent - I'm a shooter so bores are important to me. 52s are seldom encountered down here and this looks like like an excellent chance to aquire a companion rifle to my favorite "old timer" - a Vickers Westminster martini target rifle of almost the same era. If it does join me there will be a competition and the Vickers will hold its own with any modern rifle short of the heavy Annie's.

Thanks
Foster
 
#3 ·
I have one from 1924 and love it. I did some light refinishing on the stock as it had already been messed with. A great .22. Also upgraded my rear sight to a Lyman M-48J. If you don’t bother with using the safety, which on a real target rifle is unnecessary, you’ll never have to worry about getting a ‘crack of doom’. Sounds worse than it is as it doesn’t affect how well the rifle shoots or bolt/trigger operates. Good shooting.
 
#7 ·
I have a 100% original Model 52 Slow Lock also without the infamous crack of doom and the original .22 Long.R follower marked magazine.
Mine was manufactured Aug 25,1927 and it is now my favorite firearm.
I also do not use the safety and have never even tried it as I don't want to run the risk of the dreaded crack of doom.
I would recommend acquiring some of the aforementioned Wisner's reproduction magazines and safely storing your original magazine for the future.
I truly hope you enjoy your rifle as much as I do mine.
If for whatever reason you should choose to install a globe front sight DO NOT LOSE the original and hard to find 'shark fin' front sight!
I prefer the 82A ladder type rear sight as it is much quicker and easier to change it's settings for various ranges as I don't usually shot at fixed distances.
 

Attachments

#4 ·
Looking at your 2nd photo, the rifle does not appear to have a cracked locking lug (again, only important from a collector standpoint; makes no difference in shooting). Here's a link to a thread in the Winchester 52 Info superstickies with more info:
The gun is the earlier slowlock version. Can you provide the SN to narrow down date of manufacture?

In that general time period there were additional barrel choices. Anything unusual there?

The aperture on the 82A rear sight appears to have been enlarged - this is a fairly common modification.

Your magazine has the ".22 Long R." marked follower, which has a collector premium of USD 40-50. Wisner's makes good aftermarket magazines (although currently out of stock) for ~USD 25 each.
 
#11 ·
Thanks very much Gentlemen for your thoughts, appreciated. I inspected the 3 M52 rifles today and have tentatively chosen this one.

Image


The other choices were the very original rifle I first mentioned and a very heavily altered pre A (to a sporter configuration, it shot extremely well but neither fish nor fowl really) .

This pre A isn't original either, the bolt handle has been ground, the barrel shortened to 27.5" and non standard sights fitted, not to mention numerous additional sling holes in the stock.

This rifles saving grace is its honesty and the bore, which is immaculate and shoots. I'm not really a collector and this rifle will not be ruined by a bit of further judicious tinkering to improve the sights (for example replacing the Parker Hale foresight with something a bit closer to original) and making provision to scope it, maybe with something a that better reflects its long life - it's serial is # 35835

Thanks again and your thoughts are welcome.