Let’s say you could choose between a brand new Browning SA-22 from Bass Pro Shop for $699 or a 1963 Belgium made in excellent condition for the same price, which do you choose? Why? What are the arguments for both. I’ll explain the conditions of each.
The new one from BPS already has dents and handling marks because they screw up all their rifles (Cabelas now as well) moving them into the safe every night. (So you can’t get a perfect condition rifle from either Bass Pro or Cabelas now, I’ve tried, this makes three times now. Went to buy a $1800 Sharps and it already had gouges in the stock and forend, no discount either, but that’s a side note.). I could probably take my time looking for a truly “new” condition one but it could take months.
The Belgium made is at the LGS for the same price of $699, made in 1965. It is the blonde color wood which I don’t prefer, but don’t hate either. I don’t know that it’s ever been shot, if so, not enough to show any noticeable wear other than quite a few handling marks and safe marks on the wood. The metal is 99% perfect from from what I can see, pristine and if yu told me the metal was NIB I’d believe you. It’s only the wood that’s not perfect.
The “bad” on the Belgium…On the bottom of the charging handle the owner engraved their social security # and another random code. It’s not overly bad, and it’s not as deep as the proof marks, but I’m sure it’s not worth putting on the surface grinder and risking removing the proofs. It also looks like some very minor rust bleed into the end of the stock endgrain at the buttplate where it’s discolored about a 1/4”x1/2” spot on the stock. Obviously these hurt it’s collectibility but I’m not overly that concerned with as I do want to shoot this one. I wouldn’t be unhappy though if it kept or increased it’s value of course rather than depreciate as the new one would at least initially. But the “bad” issues are only noticeable upon fine inspection.
I also noticed the knurled screw on the barrel for takedown was a little loose, but I understand that can be adjusted….? They didn’t want to futz with it.
If it didn’t have any collectibility I’d take the stock and forend off the Belgium and stain it darker, but that wouldn’t be smart, I get it, and I’m not even sure it would take a darker stain, I’ve learned that the hard way in the past. That’s the only negative I can see, and that’s subjective for sure.
So I prefer the looks of the new Japanese dark walnut but prefer the idea of the Belgium gun for some collectibility points….I don’t mind the nicks in the wood on the Belgium as I know I’ll put dings and scratches in a brand new gun long before I even shoot it, I can’t manage to not do it. (My sons brand new BL-22 has two dings in the stock already and I don’t even know how they got there, it hasn’t even been shot.) If I bought a “collector gun” I’d wrap it in bubble tape and lock it in the safe terrified I’d mess it up, which no matter how hard I’d try not to, I’d do. So while I love old guns, getting a “pristine” gun then putting a ding in it would make me furious to the point it would ruin the experience.
Given they’re the same price, which is the better choice?
If it’s a no brainer then I’d get the Belgium, but if it’s a “well, it’s not that easy to choose” then I’d probably go with the new Japanese. I do love all of the Miroku guns I’ve seen, top notch.
When I get home I’ll post some pictures of the Belgium one.
Thanks guys.
The new one from BPS already has dents and handling marks because they screw up all their rifles (Cabelas now as well) moving them into the safe every night. (So you can’t get a perfect condition rifle from either Bass Pro or Cabelas now, I’ve tried, this makes three times now. Went to buy a $1800 Sharps and it already had gouges in the stock and forend, no discount either, but that’s a side note.). I could probably take my time looking for a truly “new” condition one but it could take months.
The Belgium made is at the LGS for the same price of $699, made in 1965. It is the blonde color wood which I don’t prefer, but don’t hate either. I don’t know that it’s ever been shot, if so, not enough to show any noticeable wear other than quite a few handling marks and safe marks on the wood. The metal is 99% perfect from from what I can see, pristine and if yu told me the metal was NIB I’d believe you. It’s only the wood that’s not perfect.
The “bad” on the Belgium…On the bottom of the charging handle the owner engraved their social security # and another random code. It’s not overly bad, and it’s not as deep as the proof marks, but I’m sure it’s not worth putting on the surface grinder and risking removing the proofs. It also looks like some very minor rust bleed into the end of the stock endgrain at the buttplate where it’s discolored about a 1/4”x1/2” spot on the stock. Obviously these hurt it’s collectibility but I’m not overly that concerned with as I do want to shoot this one. I wouldn’t be unhappy though if it kept or increased it’s value of course rather than depreciate as the new one would at least initially. But the “bad” issues are only noticeable upon fine inspection.
I also noticed the knurled screw on the barrel for takedown was a little loose, but I understand that can be adjusted….? They didn’t want to futz with it.
If it didn’t have any collectibility I’d take the stock and forend off the Belgium and stain it darker, but that wouldn’t be smart, I get it, and I’m not even sure it would take a darker stain, I’ve learned that the hard way in the past. That’s the only negative I can see, and that’s subjective for sure.
So I prefer the looks of the new Japanese dark walnut but prefer the idea of the Belgium gun for some collectibility points….I don’t mind the nicks in the wood on the Belgium as I know I’ll put dings and scratches in a brand new gun long before I even shoot it, I can’t manage to not do it. (My sons brand new BL-22 has two dings in the stock already and I don’t even know how they got there, it hasn’t even been shot.) If I bought a “collector gun” I’d wrap it in bubble tape and lock it in the safe terrified I’d mess it up, which no matter how hard I’d try not to, I’d do. So while I love old guns, getting a “pristine” gun then putting a ding in it would make me furious to the point it would ruin the experience.
Given they’re the same price, which is the better choice?
If it’s a no brainer then I’d get the Belgium, but if it’s a “well, it’s not that easy to choose” then I’d probably go with the new Japanese. I do love all of the Miroku guns I’ve seen, top notch.
When I get home I’ll post some pictures of the Belgium one.
Thanks guys.