Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement

Review of HillJack Quickie .22LR Magazine Loader for CZ 452/455/457

1 reading
5.7K views 14 replies 6 participants last post by  Fasteddie01  
#1 · (Edited)
Over the last few months, there have been several threads regarding loaders for CZ rimfire magazines. . Much of that discussion was about not really having any commercial sources for said device despite some feeling the need/want for one.

So at that time, I reached out to the folks at HILJACK loaders to see if they were interested in working up something for the CZ rimfire (.22) mags. Joe, the companies owner re, sponded immediately and went about by ordering a (5 round) mag for development . About 10 days later, he sent me a few prototypes of this CZ rimfire specific quickie loader for testing. What was discovered in that test process is that there are significant differences in the feed lip arrangement and dimensions of the 5 round metal and 10 round poly mags. ( He had the 5 rounder only for development since 10 rounders are unobtainium these days) After some back and fourth dimension tweaking, he had the updated final product and packaging ready to go within another week. In any case, here is a short review of the CZ 22 Lr loaders I received for test.

Description:
So the loader comes as pictured in a plastic bag with instructions/pictures on its use. Fit and finish are better than your average 3D part. Shape wise, it’s a 3 sided affair with smooth and rounded contours all around and a comfortable swell to grab on the bottom edge so you don’t have to squeeze the hack out of it while in use. The inside bottom edge is also chamfered to aid in getting it over the mag quickly. Overall, the loader seems well made, well thought out and comfortable to use.

Testing:
Testing was done using both 5 round steel and ( mostly) 10 round poly mags. Ammo used was a (particularly slimy) batch of SK Match and some old Remington Thunderbolt I had laying around. All in all, I loaded 200 rounds with this device in one rage session plus maybe 100 more at home.

Honestly, the first couple of mags I loaded felt a little awkward as I struggled with the timing of the up/down stroke of the loader and the insertion/seating of the round ( as instructed in the packaging.). However, within a dozen uses, I developed a modified loading pattern that had me filling mags with greater speed and ease. Specifically, what I figured out is that if you push forward on the top of the loader at the top of it’s stroke, it will grab the previously partially loaded round and pull it back and down at the same time. (Thus eliminating the need to push the round fullin backwards in a separate step.) Once I “got it”, it was simple to run the loader in sort of a thin elliptical orbit that become a somewhat fluid motion vs 4 separate motions described in the included instructions. This sped things up considerably and eased the learning curve.

i.e. The sequence I used goes like this:

1) Push mounted loader down to depress follower

2) Insert .22 round (so that the rim slides under the mags feed lips)

3) Cycle loader body up and tilt forward before repeating step 1.

Results :
-This device does load mags faster than doing it completely by hand. Not 3X faster but it’s clearly an improvement. The slowest part is still the handling each bullet.

-It feels like it takes less force to push the top round /follower down and load the next since the tool automatically focus its force there is no finagling with the left / weak hand.

-Because the hand that operates the loader never has to touch a bullet. This is a benefit to those of us who use rounds with “slicker than goose poop” bullet lube (i.e. SKMatch/ELEYmatch/Etc) What lube that does get on you is limited to the finger and thumb of the hand that manipulates the rounds only. Consequently, clean up is simpler afterwards. Obviously, if you are not using a heavily lubed bullet, this is of little consequence.

-There is less handling of the round altogether. You pinch the bullet (only) with two fingers and insert it into the loader/mag. I feel less force is exerted across the length of the round than if you are using two hands to stuff the mag. i.e less chance of loosening/berding a bullet . ( Which I’ve experienced while loading Eley Match via traditional methods in the past.)



Summary:
This thing works pretty well and seems to work better/smoother the more I use it. I think much of this is attributed to the open face design that allows the flexible/elliptical movement of the loader during use. There is a learning curve to use but it is a short one. For the ( I’m guessing here) sub $15 price tag, I think it’s a good value and a useful tool for the CZ 452/455/457 community. I will likely be purchasing a few spares to keep with each of my 457’s as soon as they are on the website which I’m told should be within the next week.

NOTE: I have NO stake in Hilljack and have received no compensation (other than a few test samples) for helping with the development of this particular model. I undertook this arrangement with Hilljack as a CZ rimfire enthusiast and (bored) retired engineer. I’ve just been a happy customer of this small US company in the past and figured maybe they could help out the CZ rimfire folks. ( I’ve used HillJack loaders for years on my Ruger/Buckmark and SW rimfire pistols . They make quality stuff that goes a beyond homespun 3 D printing.. ) I initiated this arrangement with Hilljack as a CZ rimfire enthusiast and (bored) retired engineer.
Image
Image
Image


 
#2 ·
BTW, I do have a 10MB/8 sec MP4 video taken of the loader in use but I am unable to figure out how to upload and post it. If anyone has any ideas on how to do that , I'd be happy to add that .
 
#3 ·
Tacoma, Thanks for this review. Hilljak inspired me to make a 'loader' for my 64s, using a 35mm film cannister and 'stuff'. I like the simplified loading, especially for the 'last few rounds' of a mag. I use SK rounds in my CZs and the grease is a bother that this will overcome.
As for the vids, I just made a YT 'channel' a couple years ago and uploaded a couple vids -> First is a 'short' of the Sav rotary mag; second is a vid of my Ruger x39 borescope showing OEM bore irregularities. Good news is I still can get MOA with that stuff.
EDIT -> When I posted this I saw that the links were 'hot' and can be cliked on to watch. " Learn something new. "
 
#6 ·
Thanks, I may have to resort to that. Still, it seems like learning to build a watch when all I want to do is know the time every now and then :)
p.s. That's some good home spun engineering!
 
#8 ·
I'm in Canada and before the Hilljaks were available up here I made this Sav-64 loader, and this Marlin-60 'speedy-loader'. The Marlin loaders later became avail up here too, at ca $50-ish. Mine cost ca $5 due to the threaded rod reinforcing the 'cluster-'. 308 case cut in half & 5/16" vinyl hose.

 
#11 ·
Item arrived, super fast ship, works as designed. Tried on the 5 round mag, not really a great time gain there of course, but sped up the process for preloads of the 10 rounders nicely. Now, if only I could get a couple more CZ magazines as easily as I got the Hilljak!
 
#12 ·
design and operation remind me of the loader I have for my CZ 75 9mm's. Once you use it for a while the awkwardness goes away it becomes second nature
 
#14 ·
This is a rather interesting topic to me. I have zero experience with the 455-457 models so perhaps the magazine springs are substantially heavier, but I have 452s and as far as I can tell, NONE of the magazines in ANY of my many other detachable box magazine fed 22s, are even remotely as EASY to load as the 452 magazines.
As far as dirty fingers from bullet lube, unless you are sucking your thumb or eating while shooting, that should be a non-issue. Just handling the ammunition is enough to get your fingers dirty even using a device such as mentioned above, because one still needs to HANDLE THE AMMUNITION.