Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement

Peep sights or optics for older eyes?

1 reading
2.3K views 43 replies 31 participants last post by  BrianK  
#1 ·
Just wondering what everyone prefers for sights especially those of us who have focularily challenged eyesacks 🤓
 
#5 ·
Scopes is the most obvious answer, and there ain‘t nothing wrong with that. A clear sight picture through glass is priceless. I also have a couple of CZ 457s with irons, and the sight radius and size of the front sight post in each are perfect for my own aging eyes (i.e., past middle age). If not that, the aperture in a peep sight do a fantastic job of focusing the aiming eye. The problem with peep sights is the additional cost to the overall system and the work required to mount - some can require quite the effort. i guess you could say the same about a scope, but they seem a different hassle to me. Different strokes, I guess.

My recommendation - start out with scopes. Pick a magnification level commensurate with your activity. Have fun with that. If you get the itch to shoot irons, check out a rifle with stock irons at you LGS. I swear by those CZs.
 
#6 ·
fmieater, what gun you in question of? I have a Rem 33 single shot 22 and it wears a Burris Fastire III red dot. It is perfect for a 22 and with the set up very accurate. I also have scopes on other rifles and they work well also, but they are for longer range like 100 yds and further. MilSurplus post above has some good info.....check the LGS and see what fits you from there.
 
#7 ·
Both, but which depends on what gun it is going on. Also sometimes add a red dot to assist :)

Muzzle loader and rimfire bolt gun have peeps (Skinner on the ML, Mossy S100/130 on the rimfire)

ARs - one has just a red dot, one has peeps and a red dot cowitnessed, one has just peeps and working on building up an upper that will be scoped only.

All the other rifles either have a ghost ring (sloppy lose peep?) or scopes.
 
#9 · (Edited)
It really comes down to what you can see. If an aperture rear sight lets you see your front sight clearly, you should be good to go (smaller apertures yield sharper focus). If your front sight still looks like a fur ball, you’ll struggle. Try this easy experiment - use a needle to poke a hole in a business card, use a ‘Sharpie’ to color one side black, with the black side toward you look through the hole and notice the difference in clarity of nearby objects.

Here’s a device that‘s been around for decades: VIA for AR-15/A2
 
#10 · (Edited)
Both...but I do like my Parker Hale peep sights on some of my Martinis and my Anshutz Model 54. I use prescription eyewear to somewhat focus clearly on the crosshair circular aperture front sight and perfectly focus on the target with my 73-year-old eyes.

I don't like the shake from a high-magnification crosshair scope when I'm shooting offhand in the standing field position; so I keep it on low power at that position.

I usually shoot at a 6"diameter steel gong plate at 100 yards, and I need perfect contrast between the painted steel target and the dirt backstop berm with the iron sights. And I prefer having the dirt backstop berm dry and seeing the bullet impact when I miss the gong.

At 200 yards...I prefer to use telescopic sights on my rimfires, so I can see the bullet going downrange occasionally and the impact hits on my painted gong or the dirt backstop berm beyond it.

I have a Thompson Center rear peep sight mounted on my 50 caliber Thompson Hawken with a Green Mountain round ball barrel for target shooting.
 
#17 ·
If you have a 6-48 or 8-32 hole anywhere near the back half of the gun check out the Skinner Lo-Pro sight. I've seen them on MLs mounted mid bore and they work, I just got one for one my MLs and it is back near the hammer and it works great. Inexpensive too. Only downside is no left/right correction, only vertical (unscrew sight more and retighten lock ring).
 
#18 ·
All depends what I'm going to do with the firearm. I use both, it all depends on the eyeball looking through it too. If one has an astigmatism a red dot might not work, but Primary Arms makes red dots with a prism that will work and so will a scope.

A peep sight? Yes, if the eyes aren't too bad a small aperture will help as will a Merit Aperture. But looking through a small aperture, whether it goes on the shooting glasses or a peep sight cuts the available light. A larger aperture, like a ghost ring, will do nothing to aid in the eyes focus.

If one has cataracts that is another issue. They "soften" what gets to the retina and the solution there is to get them fixed. I find that in bright light the target can get lost in glare. That's the best I can describe it.
 
#24 ·
I like peep sights for closer ranges and scopes for longer ranges. My astigmatism has forced me to use larger apertures as I've gotten older, but they still provide plenty of accuracy.

I think pistols are made for short distance shooting, so there will never be an optic on any of my handguns. But I would consider adding a red dot on a 'race rifle'. You don't really need magnification for quick transitions between targets at moderate and closer distances.
 
#43 ·
Even longer than that. I drilled and tapped my 22 rifle to accept a scope when still in high school and I graduated in 1956. Scopes had been around for sometime but I didn't have the funds for one until 1954 if my memory is correct.

I was blessed with excellent eyesight but I was always more accurate with a scope. Of course I eventually went through the reading, bifocal, trifocal, and progressive bifocal glasses thing where scopes were a great advantage. Now with no more cataracts my eyesight is pretty darn good but I still do better with a scope than any other type of sight.
 
#28 ·
For the type of shooting I do (standing offhand) my Burris red dots work fine. Especially the Fastfire 4.
I have significant astigmatism that is corrected by glasses. When I hear people say they cannot use red dots because they have astigmatism, I simply cannot understand why they aren't wearing prescription glasses to correct it. If it affects you using a red dot it affects your vision in every respect. See your eye doctor! It is easily remedied.
gkn
 
#30 ·
For the type of shooting I do (standing offhand) my Burris red dots work fine. Especially the Fastfire 4.
I have significant astigmatism that is corrected by glasses. When I hear people say they cannot use red dots because they have astigmatism, I simply cannot understand why they aren't wearing prescription glasses to correct it. If it affects you using a red dot it affects your vision in every respect. See your eye doctor! It is easily remedied.
gkn
I have prescription glasses but significant astigmatism. I still get a double / flared red dot. I can ignore the flare and focus on the main dot. I found it also depends on the quality/model of the optic and the intensity of the dot I have set. I have similar issues with scope reticles. My astigmatism must be worse than most people.
 
#32 ·
  • Like
Reactions: fmiester