Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement

Crown damage. Cosmetic or take to the smith?

2.1K views 36 replies 13 participants last post by  Magi  
#1 ·
Image
 
#4 ·
Have either a flat/recessed or 11 degree precision crown LATHE cut to replace that abomination. It also looks like there is at least one gouge mark inside the bore from the factory crowning reamer pilot, so you might consider having 1/2" to 3/4" of barrel removed as well.
 
#8 ·
I was considering precision work with a lathe as well. The crown damage doesn’t cross the edge but comes close. This is why I wasn’t sure if it’s actually necessary.

But looking at the picture now I see possible issues with rifling lands. I am hoping that is just lead build up. I will find out after work today.
 
#9 · (Edited)
If its not into the actual bearing surfaces of the lands and grooves, or displaced metal into such, I think that’s merely cosmetic and doubt it will affect accuracy. Shoot a bunch of groups with it, or have someone else shoot some groups with it, and if you do recut the crown, compare it afterwards, and get back with us and let us know if it was an improvement!
Post Script: when you get a barrel like that, which has some tool marks, and tool chatter, you can pretty much expect to find this level of QC, or lack there of, throughout the rest of the barrel! Doesn’t mean that the barrel won’t shoot, but its just mass produced, and probably rough throughout if you bore scoped it, and went from chamber end to crown!
 
#12 ·
Will do. I reinstalled the original rings and scope tonight. The cheap Phillips screw heads stripped at under 15 in-lbs of torque. I am saving a new pair of Burris rings for a Vortex Diamondback HP which I was planning to get this weekend. I think I will wait to see how this thing shoots first.

I'll take CCI Standard Velocity, S&B CDN Match, ELEY Target and Federal bulk to test out.
 
#17 · (Edited)
Not too bad for the first time with this toy I guess. It's an excuse but I did this in a rush. Some of these groups could have been a little tighter. I had one FTE in about every 10-15 rounds. I hope the Volquartsen extractor will fix that.

The trigger breaks clean, IMHO feels better than the stock 10/22 trigger. The magazines are disappointing overall. But that was expected.
 
#29 · (Edited)
I received my Volquartsen hammer today. I will install the VQ hammer, extractor and Mcarbo spring before the weekend. I already installed the 4-16x42 Diamondback HP scope with Burris signature high rings. It sits a bit higher than I'd like. Medium rings would have been better. I also scored a new in box 30 round magazine!

I am planning to take the 597 and my 10/22 LVT (Kidd trigger kit and other bits, Leupold 2-7x33 rimfire) to the range this weekend for accuracy comparison.
 
#33 · (Edited)
I am please to report I experienced zero FTE or FTFs in about 150 rounds shot through the 597. The VQ extractor was definitely worth it. The trigger feels much better than before also.

I think both rifles are more accurate than the operator in this case. I felt the 10/22 was more accurate by a very small margin. But that could be because I am more familiar with the 10/22.

I went ahead and ordered the medium signature rings.


Image

Image