The factory front sight on my Colt/Walther Gold Cup isn't quite tall enough, and I like fiber optic sights anyway, so I'm going to replace it. Most of my shooting is at 10-15 yards. The rear adjustable sight is pretty much bottomed out and I'm still hitting just a bit high; if I drop the top edge of the front sight below parallel to the top edge of the rear sight, I'm able to hit at point of aim. Same story more or less with higher velocity bulk stuff and Wolf target ammo, although they do shoot to a slightly different impact point even at that short range. As I measured it, my factory front sight is .125 wide, and as close as I can measure, about .185-.190 tall.
Dawson's webpage lists scads of sizes for a fiber optic front sight. I need to go taller to drop the point of impact. The width of the front sight is fine, but I could probably be okay with a sight a bit narrower if I had to do that to go taller. The tallest they list for a .125 wide sight, is .200 tall; if I go .115 wide, I can get .210 or .230 tall. I'd like to end up hitting at point of aim while at least several clicks away from either extreme on the rear sight.
I'll be calling Dawson Precision with the following questions, but I also thought I'd seek the collective wisdom of the RFC brain trust:
How tall do you think I need to go on the front sight to hit at point of aim while somewhere in the middle of the rear sight adjustment range?
The .125/.200 sight is listed as "ramped serrated"; the .115/.210 and .230 are listed as "Patridge serrated". What's the difference, and whatever that difference, will it really make any difference to me as I'm looking down the slide at my target?
As I mentioned, I'm fine with the amount of daylight around the front sight in my sight picture. Are there any generally applicable considerations about whether narrower or wider is better for that front sight, or is it completely a personal preference thing?
Again, I'll be asking all this of Dawson Precision, and of course I'll reach my own conclusions in the end, but I'd like to have an informed opinion, and where better to get informed than the boundless knowledge and infallible judgment of you all?
Dawson's webpage lists scads of sizes for a fiber optic front sight. I need to go taller to drop the point of impact. The width of the front sight is fine, but I could probably be okay with a sight a bit narrower if I had to do that to go taller. The tallest they list for a .125 wide sight, is .200 tall; if I go .115 wide, I can get .210 or .230 tall. I'd like to end up hitting at point of aim while at least several clicks away from either extreme on the rear sight.
I'll be calling Dawson Precision with the following questions, but I also thought I'd seek the collective wisdom of the RFC brain trust:
How tall do you think I need to go on the front sight to hit at point of aim while somewhere in the middle of the rear sight adjustment range?
The .125/.200 sight is listed as "ramped serrated"; the .115/.210 and .230 are listed as "Patridge serrated". What's the difference, and whatever that difference, will it really make any difference to me as I'm looking down the slide at my target?
As I mentioned, I'm fine with the amount of daylight around the front sight in my sight picture. Are there any generally applicable considerations about whether narrower or wider is better for that front sight, or is it completely a personal preference thing?
Again, I'll be asking all this of Dawson Precision, and of course I'll reach my own conclusions in the end, but I'd like to have an informed opinion, and where better to get informed than the boundless knowledge and infallible judgment of you all?