Not my point. My point is: past performance does not guaranty future results, and being prepared is a virtue. Financial considerations had nothing to do with it, and of course if you’re in the field you’d be without a braced pistol if the more fragile part broke. But good on you for going with the cheaper option.
I'm going to disagree with your position that financial considerations have nothing to do with it.
I mean, for some people it may not matter, and for some uses, it may be that buying the "best" or at least the "better" option is desirable. That's OK, but that isn't a valid reason to dump on the opinion of others, or make statements that infer that those that choose a more frugal option are somehow "cheap" as if it's a character flaw.
Look....it's a .22 PISTOL, in the end. If the brace literally breaks off....it's still a fully functional pistol. And....it's a .22...not sure what I'm doing in the field where the loss of the brace would result in a problem that would make me upset that I had only spent 25% of what I could have spent. I mean, in an "emergency" I can LITERALLY tie a stick to the stock, and have a functional brace. 😅
Even if it DOES make the gun completely unusable..it's not like I'm conducting ops in a warzone.....I just walk back to the truck, and go home. Not a big deal.
And I'm still wondering what you are doing that will break the thing, but that won't break the scope, or the gun itself.