Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner
  • Whether you're a greenhorn or a seasoned veteran, your collection's next piece is at Bass Pro Shops. Shop Now.

    Advertisement

A True Labor of Love and Fitting Tribute to a Friend

6.3K views 73 replies 46 participants last post by  TEDDY BEAR RAT  
#1 · (Edited)
Some may remember I had been helping an ailing friend liquidate the nearly 100 firearms in his personal collection about a year ago. I think I did my best and got him as much as possible given the short fuse involved. With no remaining family and few friends, my friend passed away last month, although I didn’t hear about it until some 3 weeks after the fact. We were business associates for 25 years and shared similar interests, but I would not say we were necessarily close friends. Nonetheless, about 15 years ago, for about three years, we worked daily together on a very enriching project: Together, we built two 80% Low Wall .22 Hornet rifles from scratch.

I have posted pictures of mine here in the past, but these are the first taken and posted of his rifle. He never wanted to even display it out of fear the vibrant case colors might fade. After we had liquidated most his collection, fearing this rifle might be sold or even thrown away, he brought it by the house and asked that I keep it safe. I’ll try to describe the process, but the pics will tell most of the story.

We started with two billets of 4140 steel and slowly removed everything that didn’t look like an 80% Low Wall receiver. Honestly, I did most of the machining on the receiver, breech block, and lever, since he lacked any machining experience, while he fabricated by hand the smaller parts, mostly under my direction. He made many mistakes and had to start all over on several parts, but he definitely got much better at sawing, machining, filing, stoning, and fitting by the time we were done. As an example, he ended up making a great looking extractor…only to realize it was a mirror image (backwards) of what he needed. That was an “Oh Crap!” moment for him for sure.

He made the stocks, including the solid brass, nickel-plated butt plate, and the ebony insert in the fore stock, by himself with only minimal input from me and did a great job. He also made all the accessories, screw drivers, hammers (note that he used wood from the highly figured black walnut stock blank for the screw driver handles, hammer handle, and cleaning rod handle), the sight base and mast and possibly other sight parts, the 80% Malcolm-style bases and rings, the scope, using mild steel tubing and lenses salvaged from older scopes, and even the leather-covered case, without any direction from me whatsoever. By the end of this project, I think he earned the title of custom riflesmith.

The receiver and block were heat treated to 40 and 45 on the Rockwell “C” scale, respectively. I elected to blue mine, but he had Turnbull color case the major parts after they had been heat treated through and through. The Turnbull process gives a very hard surface but actually lowered the through-and-through hardness of the receiver to about 35 and the bolt to about 40. All the smaller parts were made from various chrome-moly and tool steel and heat treated properly. Having supervised and witnessed the entire process, I am confident all parts are well made and of sufficient strength for long life and safety. The whole rifle is quite stunning in person.

The octagonal Badger barrel has a twist rate of 1:10”, the same as mine. I did the threading and chambering, by the way, and we used a new .22 Hornet reamer of minimum dimensions on both rifles. He had the barrel stamped with his name and then rust blued. We both regularly shot ¾” to 1” 100-yard 5-shot groups with our little rifles.

It is hard to visualize the petite-ness of the rifle through pictures only, so I placed my hand for perspective in some pictures. I’ll allow the pictures to tell the rest of the story:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

More pics to follow
 
#20 ·
I wonder if J.M. Davis gun museum in Claremore, Oklahoma could give it a good home and display it for all to appreciate.

Mr. Davis donated a huge amount of firearms of all types and history to the City of Claremore, in I believe the late 60’s or early 70’s before his death. In turn they built a huge museum to store and display them. I haven’t been there in many years but it was a wonderful collection with many interesting pieces.

The rifle is beautiful, and shows a huge amount work and dedication throughout the total package.
 
#69 ·
I wonder if J.M. Davis gun museum in Claremore, Oklahoma could give it a good home and display it for all to appreciate.

Mr. Davis donated a huge amount of firearms of all types and history to the City of Claremore, in I believe the late 60’s or early 70’s before his death. In turn they built a huge museum to store and display them. I haven’t been there in many years but it was a wonderful collection with many interesting pieces.

The rifle is beautiful, and shows a huge amount work and dedication throughout the total package.
In my business-traveling days, I had the good fortune to visit the museum in Claremore. IIRC, he sold some 114,000 firearms (for $1) to the city with the proviso that they house them in a museum in perpetuity and charge no admission. Definitely worth stopping by if you’re anywhere near it.
 
#23 ·
I'm not that easily impressed, but sometimes you see something that .... well ... just grabs your attention and will not let go. I'm having a hard time coming up with superlatives, so I will just say OUTSTANDING! Obviously fine craftsmanship and very attractive. Love the case colors. 😲

Something to be proud of...both the gun and the role you played in helping to bring it to life.

James
 
#24 ·
I just read this Mr. Davis entered into a 99 year lease of his collection with the state of Oklahoma for the sum of $1 in the late 60’s. They have option to renew. Sorry I didn’t do my homework before I said it was donated to the City of Claremore.

I believe it contains over 20,000 firearms. And is listed as the largest privately owned collection in the world.
 
#25 ·
First, regardless of how close you may have been, my most sincere condolences on the loss of your friend. To share the same passion to the level of building two so similar rifles says that you had more than just a little in common. As far as the rifle goes it is as beautiful a rifle as I have ever seen. You see, I too, suffer from the 1885 Hi Wall/Low Wall addiction. For me it is the inexplicable complex simplicpity that Mr. Browning envisioned so long ago. The absence of bolts cycling, buffer springs rattling and any other distracting annoyances that confuse the experience. The block that remains locked like the door on a bank’s vault. The crispness of the trigger and sear as they allow the hammer to fall. The solid contained feeling as the ignition and resulting explosion occurs. No auto/semi-auto action to contaminate the purity of the the experience. I have a few 1885s one of which is a Browning Low Wall in 22 Hornet. Not a hot round by today’s standards but at moderate ranges usually more than adequate. I hope you shoot and enjoy that absolutely beautiful creation and I believe your friend will be there enjoying it with you. Thank you for sharing both the story and the pictures.
 
#29 ·
It's a beautiful rifle, but I imagine an 80% scale Low Wall with a Swiss buttplate is difficult for most adults to shoot. To me, this is something you do/build when you have the full-size version.That rifle is a testimony to craftsmanship, but my personal preference leans towards practicality over ornamentalism. A big part of what makes a rifle beautiful, to me, is its ability to function well as a rifle for its user. So... if there was an imaginary third rifle that I spec'd, I"d likely pick a skeleton buttplate so I could comfortably shoot it... and i'd make it a takedown with .22 LR and .17 HMR barrels.
 
#37 · (Edited)
You are absolutely correct. It is almost unshootable with that short LOP and the Swiss butt plate, as cool as it looks. I tried many times to convince him to at least make a practical butt stock with a normal LOP and butt plate, just for shooting, but he was absolutely committed to the 80% scale on everything. I think that anality carried over into the detail of all those accessories, so it's hard to be critical.

So, I snapped a few new pics of mine. Geez, looking at the date, it's been 20 years! As mentioned, mine is 4140 conventionally heat treated to 40 - 45 Rockwell C. Every part, including screws, pins, and springs are hand made from scratch. I also did all the polishing and bluing using my own bluing tanks. The stock blank, though incredibly gorgeous English walnut, was too small for any full-sized rifle, and the grain flow is not ideal, so I got it for a song.

Unlike my friend, I took liberties with the design, such as an extractor at the 6 o'clock position, with more leverage but less travel than the original, and in the trigger design. I also used a through bolt for the butt stock, instead of the usual Winchester sandwiching tangs to secure it. And, as I said, this is a coil spring gun, not a flat spring. The scope is the obvious Baby Redfield. I actually don't like the way it looks on there, and the optics leave much to be desired, but it is the only petite option; the 1" scopes simply overpower the little rifle. It has been in the field several times, and my sons and I shot prairie dogs in New Mexico with it on a couple of occasions:
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image