kimber vs. bench rifles
Its hard to compare a kimber to a benchrest rifle. Especially a factory kimber. No kimber owner should be ashamed to own one because they don't group as well or whatever. Kimber .22 rifles are probably the finest quality factory produced rifle made in America, and they have an attention for detail that rivals any in the world. For all PRACTICAL purposes, they shoot as well as any rifle available, custom or mass produced. Additionally, in my opinion, they the most handsome and probably the most well thought out and innovative rimfire rifles available. The idea of the 'eccentric' offset bolt design is brilliant. As far as athetics, kimbers just look the best. They are built to be a full sized rifle. Every other rimfire rifle I have ever seen, including the highly esteemed Anschutz rifles look like they were built for childeren's hands. They just don't have the robust look of a serious rifle, and dispite how nice the wood they are stocked in or how shiney their metal finish is, or even how straight they shoot, I just can't get over how nearly every other .22 sporter sports a magazine that hangs out under the trigger guard. I beleive that in this age, we have the technology to make things both extremely functional and very beautiful- there should be no comprimise. I feel my K-22 is on track with this thought. My K-22 hunter shoots 1 MOA consistantly, which, as I mentioned earlier is for all practical purposes, is as good as any rifle. While a serious bench shooter might contest this 1 MOA is nothing compared to what many custom bench guns can shoot, my veiw is from that of practicality. A skilled marksman can hit nearly anything in the field with rifle that shoots 1 MOA. Don't get me wrong- I'm in no way advocating that bench shooting is for the weak or bench shooters are not as tough as other types of shooters. No. If we got into a debate over thoughness, we could have a really heated debate that's been done before a thousand times in which we'd eventually realize that Biathlon is the king of shooting sports and even then, that could probably be outdone if someone brought up the topic of archery... Anyways, all shooters have benefited from benchshooting competitors- their search for perfection has created great innovations for all shooters alike- better barrels, strickter machining tolerences ect.
As far as the fact that no one makes anything for the K-22, you must consider that it is still very new compared to other rifles that have all the fun custom aftermarket gismos and gunsmithing available. In time, as there will be more and more Kimber owners, there will begin to be a greater market for those things. In the meantime if one really wants something badly like a special stock, you should really consider making it for yourself. Something like this would have a lot more sentimetal value and give you much more satisfaction than one that someone else produced could give you. Someday, when I have the money and the time, I plan on making a full length mannlicher stock for my rifle. Additionally there are alot of gunsmith around that could help you turn your kimber into a real one-of-a-kind affair, though this can be expensive. Anyways, I think the kimber action has the greatest potention a bed for that custom sporter rifle or competetion rifle, and its only a matter of time before someone has the balls (or money) to get a gusmith to rework their action and turn it into a something that rivals all those sakos that have had this luxury for some time. Anyways, I love my kimber and wouldn't trade it for any other brand! Enough for my rants. mnagel