Maybe I have bad luck, but I have two of the UTG’s, and they’re a LONG ways from what I’d call “rock solid.”
If you read my prior post above you will see that the "LONG ways from ...rock solid" is fixed in 5 minutes with a drill and for about a dollar. And an arca rail clamp easily added. The modified UTG bipods are ROCK solid while these Atlas pods have free play in the leg pivots.Maybe I have bad luck, but I have two of the UTG’s, and they’re a LONG ways from what I’d call “rock solid.”
Um that is FAR from the "SAME" as a real Atlas bipod (I own several, bought directly from them.) . But if you want to support the company making a knockoff, that's up to you.Atlas Bipod $219.95
SAME bipod on eBay $22.22 (I have one that even says ATLAS on it!)
These can also be (relatively) easily modified to attach arca rail clamp ($9.95 on eBay) or another clamp type (like for a sling stud).
![]()
If you read my prior post above you will see that the "LONG ways from ...rock solid" is fixed in 5 minutes with a drill and for about a dollar. And an arca rail clamp easily added. The modified UTG bipods are ROCK solid while these Atlas pods have free play in the leg pivots.
It's so nice that you openly admit to sending your money to a company that STEALS designs and creates inferior products instead of supporting the company that actually took the time to create, R&D and manufacture. Especially companies that support the shooting community and donate products as prizes to matches across the country. But hey, you saved a buck, so I guess good for you.Through a discussion on another website I have been made aware that, as you point out, these "knock-offs" are not exactly the same as the genuine Atlas product. However, after reviewing the differences in materials, production and function there appears to be little to no significant difference in real world performance of one versus the other. (Even the genuine article has free play in the legs.) If you and others wish to pay 10+ times the price for a functionally equivalent product, all power to you. Really. It's a personal choice. But some shooters may be interested in a different value decision and may appreciate being made aware of lower cost alternatives. And some shooters like working on their stuff rather than just buy-and-bolt.
As to supporting a company that makes knock-offs, I do it all the time rather than pay what I often consider to be RIDICULOUS prices with absurd profit margins. FYI - I have used many Harris bipods over many years (I've been shooting a few decades and remember when they were just about the only bipod choice.) and consider them a good value, but to me, they are Fugly with the external springs and stamped metal. Just a personal choice.
Agree 100%I don't shoot NRL but have 3 of these that I use for general bench/prone shooting. These are bigger than your typical V8 Atlas style bipod. 24 oz and a wide stance (10" across minimum at the feet) All 7 positions lock up tight with minimal play. They are rock solid and better than any other sub $100 I've seen.
p.s. I do own Harris and Atlas as well. I just like these regardless of their lack of brand name.
![]()
Amazon.com : UUQ 8" - 12” Adjustable Bipod, Heavy Duty Carbon Fiber Tactical Rifle Bipod, Picatinny/Weaver Rail Mount Base (Quick Detach Lever) : Sports & Outdoors
Amazon.com : UUQ 8" - 12” Adjustable Bipod, Heavy Duty Carbon Fiber Tactical Rifle Bipod, Picatinny/Weaver Rail Mount Base (Quick Detach Lever) : Sports & Outdoorswww.amazon.com