Does that mean it DOESN'T have some kind of a Ruger on the cover?j.r. guerra in s. texas said:
Does that mean it DOESN'T have some kind of a Ruger on the cover?j.r. guerra in s. texas said:FWIW, I received my 2006 Gun Digest yesterday - wow has it changed!![]()
I meant the 2006 Gun Digest.recumbent said:
A friend who is an "industry insider" confirms your suspicions. He called it a "paid advertorial."recumbent said:I would say it involves payola........
I have that one too. It is a pale shadow of the 1972 classic.Crete said:EDIT to add: There is another .22 rimfire book issued in 1993 by Lachuk and Guns and Ammo. It is available here (among other gun-related magazines). It is called The Complete Book of .22 Rimfire: http://cgi.ebay.com/Lot-5-American-...goryZ378QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem