Joined
·
514 Posts
I have a Ruger MkII Govt. model and a Buckmark Silhouette model.
The Ruger is OK but I love the Buckmark. I have to clean the Ruger a lot sooner than the Buckmark to keep it from malfunctioning. The Ruger has an exposed trigger linkage right under the edge of the chamber area and it seems to collect grit which affects the trigger rather quickly. I dont know if that is changed in the 22/45.
I found the Buckmark more comfortable to hold, and more accurate. Probably not a fair comparrison since the Buckmark has a 10 inch bull bbl and the Ruger only a 5 inch bull bbl. Both have had scopes at one time. I have been shooting the buckmark at bowling pin matches for the last couple of years, I shoot approx 35-40 rounds min, every week, 50 weeks a year, & I clean it religously every 4 to 6 weeks :
(or it starts to act up.) I have four mags (they are expensive, $22-$27 each ) and they seem to be made very well and have Never given me any problems.
Of course I would like to get a 22/45 too. Cant have too many guns, especially .22s Theres no reason not to get both, since any gun is less expensive to feed than a teenager! (I got one of those too.)
*Other things I like about the buckmark series of pistols are the way it disassembles, Vastly less annoying than the ruger and the barrels can be changed without changing the slide/receiver, like you must do with the Ruger.
*The mag release position.
*The spring loaded magazine plunger in the bottom of the grip, when you hit the mag release that mag flies out! I hate having to "dig out" the mags from the butt of the Ruger!
*The screw on wood grips. You can get aftermarket grips for the Mark II but the ruger 22/45 has the ruger hard plastic grip. I don't care for the feel of that plastic and there aren't any aftermarket grips except the slip on peices of bycycle inner tube types.
*The sights. I just like the Browning pistol sights better than the Rugers.
The Ruger is OK but I love the Buckmark. I have to clean the Ruger a lot sooner than the Buckmark to keep it from malfunctioning. The Ruger has an exposed trigger linkage right under the edge of the chamber area and it seems to collect grit which affects the trigger rather quickly. I dont know if that is changed in the 22/45.
I found the Buckmark more comfortable to hold, and more accurate. Probably not a fair comparrison since the Buckmark has a 10 inch bull bbl and the Ruger only a 5 inch bull bbl. Both have had scopes at one time. I have been shooting the buckmark at bowling pin matches for the last couple of years, I shoot approx 35-40 rounds min, every week, 50 weeks a year, & I clean it religously every 4 to 6 weeks :
Of course I would like to get a 22/45 too. Cant have too many guns, especially .22s Theres no reason not to get both, since any gun is less expensive to feed than a teenager! (I got one of those too.)
*Other things I like about the buckmark series of pistols are the way it disassembles, Vastly less annoying than the ruger and the barrels can be changed without changing the slide/receiver, like you must do with the Ruger.
*The mag release position.
*The spring loaded magazine plunger in the bottom of the grip, when you hit the mag release that mag flies out! I hate having to "dig out" the mags from the butt of the Ruger!
*The screw on wood grips. You can get aftermarket grips for the Mark II but the ruger 22/45 has the ruger hard plastic grip. I don't care for the feel of that plastic and there aren't any aftermarket grips except the slip on peices of bycycle inner tube types.
*The sights. I just like the Browning pistol sights better than the Rugers.