Rimfire Central Firearm Forum banner

Bob G

463 5
Greetings:

Is the 1710 classic with the heavy barrel more accurate than the standard barrel ? Thanks all.

Bob.
1 - 6 of 6 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,241 Posts
Bob: I will say effectively no though it will depend on the individual rifle. I think you will kick yourself if you get the heavy one. The standard barrel 1710's are pretty heavy already I think a heavy barrel one would be pretty unappealing as a sporter because you won't want to carry it anywhere.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
9 Posts
Discussion Starter · #3 ·
1710 HV

Thanks for the reply,

I know what mean. I've looked at the 1710 HV, and it is way too heavy for a sporter. It's certainly not a competition rifle, so if there is no accuracy gain, why carry the extra weight. I answerd my question.

Bob.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
35 Posts
BobG,
I can't speak for the standard weight 1710,but I have a 1710D HW that will shoot one ragged hole all
day long with Wolf MT or Lapua M, and even American Eagle. I can be sure to average
less than 3/8" with the Wolf MT. At 50 yds. My
best are un measurable, Five shots that look like one bullet hole. The rifle does weigh over 9 lbs with scope. I'm 61 yrs. old and carry a 12 lb. shiloh sharps afield. Nine lbs. feels light. I can't say absolutly that the heavey barrel will be more accurate, but that has always been my experience. Either one will probably be the most accurate rimfire you'll ever own.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
13 Posts
SVT versus 1710D HB

I had a Kimber SVT and an HS (which is very nice, but touchy) and sold the SVT and bought a 1710D HB......I am very please with the 1710D and think it is a much better gun than the SVT.

My opinion for what its worth.......
 
1 - 6 of 6 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top