[HUSHKABOOM]

For hunting and carry in the field I would stick with the standard barrel instead of the heavy. I do not think you willo see a big difference in accuracy.

 

[Steelhead Dr.]

Try and PM this guy and see if its still for sale.

http://www.rimfirecentral.com/forums/showthread.php?t=443142

 

[fxkllr]

Romans,
I bought the standard barrel 597 mag back in Feb. and it is as accurate as you will probably ever need. I tinkered with mine and free floated the barrel and did the other recommended adjustments to it, but even before that it would shoot 3/4" groups at 50 yds all day long. Ammo choice will be the biggest variable for accuracy. Mine really likes the 40 grain Gamepoints but it shoots the lighter stuff ok.

 

[Al the Infidel]

For hunting and carry in the field I would stick with the standard barrel instead of the heavy. I do not think you willo see a big difference in accuracy.

+1
All things being equal the edge would go to the hb. All things with the 597 aren't equal however.

 

[staff3704]

+1 again. I had a choice of standard or heavy barrel (both used - both laminated stock). Since I would be in the field and not benchrest, I choose the standard. But I also noticed that Rem's 597 barrel was thicker than some other makers. Mine also is 22 Mag. Did the hammer change and like it.