Win. 94-22 - RimfireCentral.com Forums

Go Back   RimfireCentral.com Forums > >

Join Team RFC to remove these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-01-2011, 01:56 PM
widowshooter

Join Date: 
Aug 2009
Location: 
Lake City Calif. population 100
Posts: 
25
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
Win. 94-22



Log in to see fewer ads
I have a 94-22 made in I think 1991. It has a checkered stock.
There is no model marked on the gun.
I was wondering what model it is, maybe an xtr?
Will be greatful for any help.......Ray
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-01-2011, 02:35 PM
wproct's Avatar
wproct

Join Date: 
Dec 2006
Location: 
Iowa
Posts: 
5,192
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
The barrel should be marked "Winchester 9422 XTR".
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-01-2011, 04:45 PM
humperdingle

Join Date: 
Jan 2011
Location: 
Fife, Scotland
Posts: 
11
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by wproct View Post
The barrel should be marked "Winchester 9422 XTR".
Yes that's exactly right. Mine had no chequering whatsoever, and just had 9422 stamped on it. Maybe the woodwork has been replaced?
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #4  
Old 02-01-2011, 04:54 PM
widowshooter

Join Date: 
Aug 2009
Location: 
Lake City Calif. population 100
Posts: 
25
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
thanks for the quick responses guys.
I was present when the gun was bought new. In fact, it was on my reccomendation. So I know the stock has never been replaced.
There is no "xtr" stamped anywhere on the gun.
I am thinking of selling this gun, as I never shoot it. It has no dings, or marks on it.
It's a good shooter. Any ideas as to the price I should ask.....I would also consider a trade. Looking for a browning SA-22, chambered in .22 short.........Ray

Last edited by widowshooter; 02-01-2011 at 04:59 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-03-2011, 02:06 PM
Pete44ru
US Air Force Veteran NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Jul 2005
Location: 
Rhode Island
Posts: 
5,096
TPC Rating: 
86% (9)
My 9422M-XTR has the "XTR" logo molded into the buttplate - but it's likely very early XTR's weren't marked, until Winchester finished the transition from only making standard models to additionally making the XTR's alongside.

There's also early XTR's (eXTRa finished) sans checkering, around.

.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-03-2011, 09:16 PM
widowshooter

Join Date: 
Aug 2009
Location: 
Lake City Calif. population 100
Posts: 
25
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
Checked the butplate.....no "xtr"
Did Winchester make 94-22's in the 90's with a checkered stock that was not an
xtr?..........Ray
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-04-2011, 07:06 PM
Pete44ru
US Air Force Veteran NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Jul 2005
Location: 
Rhode Island
Posts: 
5,096
TPC Rating: 
86% (9)
If it has a checkered stock, no "XTR" designation, AND a rubber buttplate/pad - it's a 9422 Legacy - which IIRC woulda been about right for 1991.

.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-05-2011, 01:00 PM
johnbe
US Army Veteran NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Nov 2010
Location: 
Renton, WA
Posts: 
33
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
I've owned a 9422 for several years. It is by far the most reliable 22 repeating rifle I've ever owned. The new Weatherbys and Kimbers (I own both) are just quality junk in comparison. Who needs a rifle you can't unload without a cleaning rod or with magazines with feeding problem? It may not be a "tack driver", but I've never had a problem with my 9422 in the 13 years I've owned it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-05-2011, 03:06 PM
Lloyd S.
National Guard Veteran NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Oct 2002
Location: 
Central Arkansas
Posts: 
2,482
TPC Rating: 
100% (13)
"quality junk?" Sounds like an oxymoron to me.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-07-2011, 08:50 PM
johnbe
US Army Veteran NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Nov 2010
Location: 
Renton, WA
Posts: 
33
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lloyd S. View Post
"quality junk?" Sounds like an oxymoron to me.
Nope. Not Oxymorons. One is a Weatherby mark XXII and the other is a Kimber 22 Classic
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-07-2011, 09:32 PM
M2HB's Avatar
M2HB
NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Apr 2004
Location: 
Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 
30,405
TPC Rating: 
100% (4)
9422s are real gems. Its too bad that they are no longer being produced.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-08-2011, 08:34 PM
wproct's Avatar
wproct

Join Date: 
Dec 2006
Location: 
Iowa
Posts: 
5,192
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by M2HB View Post
9422s are real gems. Its too bad that they are no longer being produced.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-08-2011, 09:09 PM
M2HB's Avatar
M2HB
NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Apr 2004
Location: 
Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 
30,405
TPC Rating: 
100% (4)
Maybe Winchester will see the error of their ways and reintroduce it in stainless steel.


I can dream, can't I.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-08-2011, 10:55 PM
wproct's Avatar
wproct

Join Date: 
Dec 2006
Location: 
Iowa
Posts: 
5,192
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by M2HB View Post
Maybe Winchester will see the error of their ways and reintroduce it in stainless steel.


I can dream, can't I.
While we are dreaming, lets include the Smith & Wesson model 41 and the Marlin 39A in stainless steel also!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:49 PM.

Privacy Policy

DMCA Notice

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2021, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2021 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2000-2018 RimfireCentral.com
x