Input needed on Buckmark v Ruger Mk - Page 2 - RimfireCentral.com Forums

Go Back   RimfireCentral.com Forums > > >

Notices

Join Team RFC to remove these ads.
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-18-2019, 09:07 AM
ammohog
NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Jan 2009
Location: 
Texas
Posts: 
2,647
TPC Rating: 
100% (10)


Log in to see fewer ads
I only have two dogs in this fight. The Mk IV Competition and the Buck Mark Hunter. The Hunter is good out of the box, and the Competition was one of the batch recalled. The good news is that the recall resulted in a slightly better (as in lighter) trigger pull. Also, the Competition got an aftermarket VQ firing pin kit, and some blue loktite on the front pivot screw, as well the magazine "fix". After all of this, I still like them both. The Competition is ammo picky, and the Hunter isn't. The accuracy factor: They really do take turns shooting best groups with different brands of ammo (at 25 yards from a rest), and I have tested them many times. The Hunter has a better trigger, at least in my opinion. I have noticed with cleaning, the Hunter has more carbon and lead buildup than the Competition. Verified with a borescope. I really do like them both, and can't imagine selling one or the other. I would suggest having one of each, that way you can have twice as much fun at the range! ....... AH

My 14 year old G-son likes the Hunter best. Then again.... he hasn't cleaned either one .....yet.

Last edited by ammohog; 11-18-2019 at 09:23 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-19-2019, 09:29 PM
staff3704
US Air Force Veteran NRA Member - Click Here To Join!

Join Date: 
Jun 2010
Location: 
GA
Posts: 
1,321
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
Quote:
Originally Posted by farrlarr View Post
From all that I have read over the years, it is generally conceded that Buckmark has a better trigger out of the box than does Ruger. It is also conceded that there are many more aftermarket parts for Ruger than Buckmark and that the triggers can be made comparable or better with the judicious addition of such parts. I think it is also generally conceded that the Buckmark is a bit more accurate out of the box (watch me get all sorts of arguments about that! ).
No argument from me and I have owned all of these however with that said I believe customer service is better with Ruger. And I can give examples of that. Know also that with work and/or after market parts you can get better performance out of the Ruger than the stock Buckmark (been there done that). But better performance will cost you extra time/money.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-03-2019, 04:42 PM
flphotog
US Navy Veteran NRA Member - Click Here To Join! GOA Member

Join Date: 
Nov 2013
Location: 
Tampa Bay, FL
Posts: 
269
TPC Rating: 
0% (0)
I've got both the Ruger MKIV and a Buckmark Medallion and much to my surprise I really prefer the Buckmark. Very surprised because I used to have a Buckmark hunter really didn't like it at all.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off




All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Privacy Policy

DMCA Notice

Powered by vBulletin
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimisation provided by DragonByte SEO (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
vBulletin Optimisation provided by vB Optimise (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2019 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright 2000-2018 RimfireCentral.com
x